Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi

I've received an email from Blitz in regards to my Business Trader Subscription. Apparently, it's expired and my account has been locked for an entire month.

However, when I check my Paid Subscriptions screen, it shows that my subscription is due to expire on 6 March 2009.

Initially when we paid our subscription, there were delays in getting us established and Rebecca extended our subscription until 1 April 2009.

-----Original Message-----

From: SAU Trader Admin [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Wednesday, 19 March 2008 1:12 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: New Subscription Purchase

Hi Thuy,

Apologies for not having responded earlier, this is the first I have heard of your payment.

I am not quite sure why I haven't received anything earlier reading your subscription, I will look into this.

I have activated your account and will give you the next few weeks free for the inconvenience. So your next subscription won't be due until 1 April 09.

Again sorry for inconvenience, let me know if you have any questions.

Rebecca

SAU TraderAdmin

I have sent an email to '[email protected]" regarding this matter, but haven't received a reply. I have also created a ticket on the Help Desk. No reply. Nor have my rights been reinstated.

Could someone please look into this matter and resolve it as soon as possible ? I haven't done anything wrong and not getting any sort of assistance from admin.

Regards

Thuy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241003-business-trader-subscription/
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It has been 2 months since I posted this thread and I still haven't had a response from PranK or any of the mods or admin members.

This is the initial PM I get from Blitz:

post-48578-1230677616_thumb.jpg

I check my Subscriptions and it states that my Trader account expires on the 6th March 2009.

post-48578-1230676947_thumb.jpg

In fact, my Trader account expiry date should be 1st April 2009 according to my email with Rebecca when I first joined the forum:

post-48578-1230677933_thumb.jpg

I have sent PMs to Blitz, funkymonkey, PranK and SAUTraderAdmin. Only Blitz has read my PM according to the message tracker:

post-48578-1230677066_thumb.jpg

I even create ticket at the Help Desk:

post-48578-1230678398_thumb.jpg

Still no response. From anyone.

I've paid the $550 charged to become a trader on the forum. However, my account is locked so that I can't create threads.

I have been polite about this. Been patient while contacting those that are SUPPOSED to look after the forum and its' members.

If you had paid someone $550 and then didn't receive the goods/services in return, what would you do ? You contact the seller to find out what went wrong. However, the seller doesn't respond to your emails or PMs, you'd be left feeling scammed.

So, is SAU trying to scam me ?

Or is there someone with a grudge against me, making it difficult for me to trade on here?

Which probably explains the silence from the mods and admin team. I know that this problem isn't difficult to fix nor will it take a huge amount of time. Just needs someone to actually bother to do it.

Who do I need to contact to resolve this ?

Edited by JImports
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...