Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, just found this section so i thought i would post a few pics, i do allot of track work up at Mallala International Raceway here in South Australia, don't do much skyline stuff but a small group of them came up to a track day recently along with the new R35 GTR so i put in a few of the photos from that day, almost all my work is with Porsche's, mainly 997 GT3's so i put in a few of the photos i have sold of them to.

The first picture was requested by a client to be printed as an A1 size poster so i did that for him and it turned out incredible!! no pixelation what so ever, so if anyone is interested in one you can PM me, also some of my work is for sale here,

http://www.redbubble.com/people/farid/

I have managed to get a whole day photo shoot with the first South Australian delivered new GTR when it lands here in June 2009, it will be a Black on Black/red interior, the white one pictured below is a grey import and isn't a Australian delivered car, will keep you guys posted on the photoshoot.. anyways, enjoy the photos, comment to let me know what you guys thing, good AND bad comments :D

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

6.jpg

5.jpg

7.jpg

8.jpg

9.jpg

10.jpg

11.jpg

12.jpg

13.jpg

14.jpg

15.jpg

16.jpg

17.jpg

18.jpg

My A1 size GTR poster

19.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/241454-new-photographer-intro/
Share on other sites

I think you should take those pictures down and upload them properly and embed it again.

The pictures are all dark/soft/not sharp etc etc

I just went to that site you listed and the pictures look a lot sharper and clearer (esp the first photo)

Nice work and pls list what gear you are using :ninja:

Also any panning shots??

Edited by siddr20
I think you should take those pictures down and upload them properly and embed it again.

The pictures are all dark/soft/not sharp etc etc

I just went to that site you listed and the pictures look a lot sharper and clearer (esp the first photo)

Nice work and pls list what gear you are using :P

Also any panning shots??

Not sure why they are coming out so crap when i shrink them down using my Mac.....

dsc0111or6.th.jpg dsc0166rc7.th.jpg dsc0173ht3.th.jpg

dsc0175aa1.th.jpg dsc0361jt9.th.jpg dsc0371uq8.th.jpg

dsc0377ts1.th.jpg dsc1600xu4.th.jpg dsc1601fp9.th.jpg

dsc1603xq7.th.jpg preseptember62wu6.th.jpg preseptember80nq9.th.jpg

this is slightly better....

what lenses do you have?

the shots shown above were taken with either my 18-135mm nikon lens or the tamron 70-300mm, i also have a 10-20mm sigma lens but that is yet to make it to a track day. when i get the D300 the 10-20 will be making more of an appearance

Dont mean to hijack your thread so I apologise.

With lens choice. Ive been told tamron and sigma brand lens are crap. I currently have a nikon kit lens 18-55mm and a 50mm F1.8 prime lens.

Looking for something with longer focal length like a 70-200 F2.8 but the price for the nikon is nuts!! is the sigma/tamron alternative any good in your opinions? I have a Nikon.

Thanks

Dont mean to hijack your thread so I apologise.

With lens choice. Ive been told tamron and sigma brand lens are crap. I currently have a nikon kit lens 18-55mm and a 50mm F1.8 prime lens.

Looking for something with longer focal length like a 70-200 F2.8 but the price for the nikon is nuts!! is the sigma/tamron alternative any good in your opinions? I have a Nikon.

Thanks

i don't know who told you the tamron and sigma are crap....... i can tell you now they are not!! if you can afford it you should go for the nikon brand, but other than that the third party ones such as Tokina and sigma are 98% as good as the nikon/cannon ones and tamron is not that far behind. the third party ones are awesome for the price, i know many pros that use them as they can not justify the price. the main differences is the build quality, not saying they are crap, they are very good but the nikon are just a little bit more durable. also sharpness, they claim to be more sharp but every person i talk to can not pick it.....

hope that helps.

let me know if you need more info

Dont mean to hijack your thread so I apologise.

With lens choice. Ive been told tamron and sigma brand lens are crap. I currently have a nikon kit lens 18-55mm and a 50mm F1.8 prime lens.

Looking for something with longer focal length like a 70-200 F2.8 but the price for the nikon is nuts!! is the sigma/tamron alternative any good in your opinions? I have a Nikon.

Thanks

I dont know whos told you tamron and sigma lens are crap. THEY ARE ONE OF THE BEST OUT THERE LOL!!!

If they were crap they wouldn't be in business. Professional photographers wouldn't use them if so!!

The price is expensive for that nikon lens you posted above (70-200 F2.8) coz its f 2.8 :) Its bloddy quick :(

If its VR it will be even more expensive.

Do you really need it?

Why not start of with something like this: 55-200 f4-f5.6 nikon lens VR

See if this suits your needs.

Heck even try out the 70-300mm f4.-5.6 AF --- BLOODY CHEAP!!! like under 200 bucks

That lens also comes with AF-S and VR - i think under 800 bucks..

I know there is a 80-200 one too.. About 1.4k :)

Edited by siddr20
i don't know who told you the tamron and sigma are crap....... i can tell you now they are not!! if you can afford it you should go for the nikon brand, but other than that the third party ones such as Tokina and sigma are 98% as good as the nikon/cannon ones and tamron is not that far behind. the third party ones are awesome for the price, i know many pros that use them as they can not justify the price. the main differences is the build quality, not saying they are crap, they are very good but the nikon are just a little bit more durable. also sharpness, they claim to be more sharp but every person i talk to can not pick it.....

hope that helps.

let me know if you need more info

With some you can notice the big difference :(

Esp if you comparing it with the stock kit lens for example.

But yup the sigma/tamron are great alternatives :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
    • I'll sit down and get a post together 😁
    • The factory oil pressure sender is no longer in the car that's what is confusing me. In the Taarks adapter I have an aftermarket Bosch style pressure/temp sender and the factory temp sender only. Oil pressure is perfect. Where does the factory oil temp sender go to if there were never any gauges? Why was it there from the factory?
×
×
  • Create New...