Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Generally, every track day will have a normal half for timed sprints in the morning and an event in the afternoon.

I want to maintain the roots of our event by having a half day for guys who just want to come out and run timed laps.

Also I want to ensure beginners always feel welcome and can come and have a go. We will continue to run the beginners sessions.

Time Attack Series: 6 rounds (afternoon sessions, 3 Clubman, 3 Sprint)

5 out of 6 rounds will count towards points. Therefore if you complete all 6 rounds you can drop your worst result.

You have to complete at least 3 rounds to place at the end of the year.

A minimum of 5 laps must be completed at a round to be eligible for points.

Time Attack Series Classes:

Street Class, Division 1 : AWD - Battles of GT-R vers EVO vers WRX vers GT-4 etc

Street Class, Division 2 : Forced Induction - Battles of 4/6/8 Cly 2WD Turbos, Rotaries, Skylines, BA's etc

Street Class, Division 3 : V8 Naturally Aspirated - Classic Ford vers Holden with some Toyota power

Street Class, Division 4 : Naturally Aspirated ( but not V-8 ) - All 4 and 6 cylinder cars including Rotaries

Race Class, Division 5 : All cars that do not fit into a street class above. Outright Class.

Points Allocation:

1st = 30 points

2nd = 25 points

3rd = 22 points

4th = 20 points

5th = 19 points

6th = 18 points

7th = 17 points

8th = 16 points

9th = 15 points

10th = 14 points

11th = 13 points

12th = 12 points

13th = 11 points

14th = 10 points

15th = 9 points

16th = 8 points

17th = 7 points

18th = 6 points

19th = 5 points

20th = 4 points

If there is a tie in points at the end of the year, the placings will be determined by the following rulings, in the given order.

1. Lowest average best lap for the year. (each best lap at each round run will be averaged to give a single result).

2. Best single point score at a round.

3. Most attended rounds.

Class Rules:

See Thread Time Attack 2009 Car Classification Rules

Tyre Rules:

See Thread Time Attack Series - Tyre Register

Rulings:

The organisers decision shall be final. No dispute shall be entered.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242293-time-attack-2009-series/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...