Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am 50:50 at the moment in regards to a turbo upgrade.

I am planning on getting a turbo kit from extreme turbo manifolds for my r33 gtst 2.5l. Thats a gt3582, wastegate, dump, screamer (plumbedback, manifold, oil lines etc all ceramic coated.

Also upgrading to 740cc injectors, z32 and fuel pump to support the above. I already have the remaining needed mods.

This all installed, tuned etc will cost me roughly $7500. Will be an easy 280rwkw on low boost 300 on high, not going to push for more as internals are stock. With these mods 350 could be done.

I expected to have my current loan paid off by the end of next year. Then i could move on and save for house deposit etc. Obviously i will need to get the money loaned and its going to add roughly an extra 10 months to my debt. So i will be finished in roughly 22months rather then 12 without the turbo.

Everyone is telling me not to do it with the current economic state and you dont need anymore power its already fast crap. They could never understand as their views are biased.

I am having the car in for a 100,000km service in a couple of weeks and will get the tuner to check the health to see if upgrade is ok, i got it with service records from Japan with 60,000 and most of my kms have been freeway so it shoudlnt be a problem.

I just keep telling myself you only live once and its only 10 months extra. It has been a dream for many years.

Its a big decision and i normally wouldnt bother asking but i need some unbiased opinions.

Cheers

Pat

post-35160-1225325143_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242443-should-i-do-it-turbo-upgrade/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I said yes even before i read your thread mate hahahaha

but after reading i still say yes, if that wot u want then go for it. What i would be checking when u refinance is what the interest rate is. Working at a bank i can tell you it would generally move to current interest rates which are full of shit at the moment. Dw about the financial crisis (won't affect a personal loan) or whatever as long as your stable at your job and the loan is a fixed interest rate. Check early payout fees and things like that as well...

If after calculating the extra cost (being able to afford it) and its what you want to do then forget about everyone elses opinion.

Regards

Ash

Btw can you pm me details on your turbo supplier?

Yeah right with you mate

I had loans approved instantly. Was going to add on to existing loan but as you said that is increasing the current loan interest rate with it to 14.4% from 12.5% and they only give checks so it wouldnt really work out as there is money going all over the place to different suppliers. Nab you suck!

So i decided if i am going to do it i will get a new seperate loan from a different bank. police & nurses 13.99% and they can just put it in my account.

Its no secret with the turbo supplier

Leigh from extreme turbo manifolds. Just google that name and there is prices on the calaisturbo site. Only problem is he is so good and busy its a 2 month lead time

Edited by Pattygtst

DO IT.

Just make sure it's not one of those supposedly "bolt on" turbos.. the ones with bastardised Nissan exhaust housings..

Also make sure you have some slush to account for things that may require modification!

Its a genuine garret gt3582 aka gt3540 with .82 exhaust housing..

Everything will be quoted before hand on paper before i have it installed. Only thing will need a unknown amount of modification is the turbo to cooler piping. The rest is straight forward.

Edited by Pattygtst
They only give out checks??? Your not on a secured loan are you? Another way round that is just deposit that check into your own account LOL. whats the t and c's with police and nurses? early payout fees, monthly fees, setup fees?

Its not really the issue but its $2.5 monthly fees with $149 establishment fee an no penalty fees for early payout. Its the pick of the bunch so far if you know a better one let me know but i am can live with that.

Its a genuine garret gt3582 aka gt3540 with .82 exhaust housing..

Everything will be quoted before hand on paper before i have it installed. Only thing will need a unknown amount of modification is the turbo to cooler piping. The rest is straight forward.

I take it you're going to have a workshop install it? definately keep some slush fundage then. Everything may appear straight forward on paper but is rarely the case unless the turbo is a direct bolt on to stock manifolds :P

Have you thought about what you're going to do when the stock crossover pipe (the one with the bov) doesn't fit next to the turbo?

P.S. I'm putting the exact same turbo on my engine, you may be able to get away with things like 120deg pipe to throttlebody where I couldn't. I have had to go custom forward facing plenum due to the extra height of the 30.

pick a smaller turbo if you only want 300rwkw

yeah i thought about that but this one gives me more room for improvement for the future if i choose.

Other options would have been 3071(will struggle to get that power), 3076 (may also struggle), 3082 (spool times are close to 35) Jap turbos are out of the question with the prices

Garret prices are the same for all of them.

I had considered smaller for better response. But leigh and tuner recommend i go the bigger option. However i could be persuaded.

dunno if the .63 will or wont choke

thought someone had another thread with a 3071r making good power (somewhere in forced induction)

but @ 280rwkw i think the standard internals are already being pushed

plus side is rb25 engines are $1600 replacement lol

also with mods 1 thing leads to another

starts are small then next then you know engine dies, you do a full custom setup

most guys in the magazines prolly happened that way

and if you are doing it

keep cash aside, greddy intake manifold is exra $1.2k :P + pipe work

Do you not think a .63 housing will chock?

Nope. I think it would be as reponsive as the .82 on a 3L is reported to be..

dunno if the .63 will or wont choke

thought someone had another thread with a 3071r making good power (somewhere in forced induction)

but @ 280rwkw i think the standard internals are already being pushed

plus side is rb25 engines are $1600 replacement lol

also with mods 1 thing leads to another

starts are small then next then you know engine dies, you do a full custom setup

most guys in the magazines prolly happened that way

and if you are doing it

keep cash aside, greddy intake manifold is exra $1.2k :P + pipe work

Or a custom manifold using a GTR plenum for less than half that price.. you might even find the runners line up better with the 25t manifold! lol

I am keeping plenum and throttle body stock. Would be nice but its not needed just extra $

Cooler to turbo piping and intake pipe will need a bit of work. All has been accounted for and will have an extra $1000 if needs be.

Tuner reckons .63 housing will be chocking.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...