Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

My powers of deduction tell me that the GT35R .63 housing has made 345rwkw @ 21psi on msnismo's RB25, doesn't sound like it's choking up but I was say that it's probably nearing the limits of the .63 housing..

Might be worth seeing if her setup is still for sale..

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Fs...gh-t238142.html

Edited by bubba

hmm very interesting bubba thankyou. That has saved me some searching. That may change things for the housing at least but i still think its the right turbo.

Only problem there is it doesnt show what rpm it hit full boost. She did say though full boost by 3800 so we will assume she is correct. That is very good.

It would save me about 1500 if i got hers but with etm i am getting a better manifold, wastegate, dump pipe, screamer, oil lines etc all ceramic coated brand new. I need peace of mind.

I have some pondering to do.

Edited by Pattygtst

HD excedy clutch will handle over 300kw easy. Breaks and suspension stock

After a quick chat with tuner and leigh.

They think the .63 housing is pointless on the gt35 as the top end goes out the window especially since the 25 wants to rev its impractical. You can see on the dyno that its chocking on the high rpm. That power figure seems suss. Better of going down to a 3076r which is not going to get 300 more like 250 real kilowatts.

All good valid responses guys keep them coming.

Edited by Pattygtst
hmm very interesting bubba thankyou. That has saved me some searching. That may change things for the housing at least but i still think its the right turbo.

Only problem there is it doesnt show what rpm it hit full boost. She did say though full boost by 3800 so we will assume she is correct. That is very good.

It would save me about 1500 if i got hers but with etm i am getting a better manifold, wastegate, dump pipe, screamer, oil lines etc all ceramic coated brand new. I need peace of mind.

I have some pondering to do.

I wouldn't exactly say an ETM manifold is better than a 6boost manifold, they are both top of the range! what you would get if hers is still available is a proven setup that would be straight bolt on.

Her setup isn't choking, she said it was still climbing when it hit the 8000rpm limiter.. if a .82 doesn't choke a 30 I really don't see a .63 choking a 25.

I believe my setup is THE definition of choking *smirk* ~250rwhp @ 4600rpm which holds till about 5800rpm then in the space of 1000rpm it drops to 90rwhp :P

Edited by bubba

I thought I was getting ripped off on my loan (12%)..well actually I am considering mates of mine are on 9-10% loans for the same amount... I think you need to keep shopping around, or at least change the length of the loan and then pay it outright when you have a chance.

So $7,500 to maybe $9k on a loan bolted to a fairly standard GTST worth maybe $13k?

I know people fall in love with thier cars and thats fair enough. But, consider what a budget of $20k+ will buy you in terms of an already modified car to the level you are seeking. I suggest you can buy something that goes better and has more money spent on it and be miles in front on the spend....then again we all do it the wrong way so others can buy our mega dollar heart ache for a bargain price :sick:

You still have about 'another' $12k on top of this turbo setup to spend before your car is going to be worth $18k, if that makes sense.

Having said that.

I would say that if you don't have the money to build this lying around you actually need to evaluate whether you 'can' afford to run a 300rwkw vehicle whilst paying off a loan? More power when used wears everything out real fast. Unless you want to pose in front of your car with a dyno sheet you will need to think about this aspect to cover yourself.

If you can consider that the best position to be in is one where you have the coin ready for a rebuild in your back pocket.

Also, does it matter if the car is off the road for a very long period of time?

On the question of the turbo selection others have mentioned the 0.64 housing on that turbo and I would agree it has all the legs you need.

You might consider the actual average power as a goal rather than the peak (unless you are the dyno queen type), it is possible to configure the selection of parts around a wider midrange goal rather than peak output. Depends on your ultimate reason for wanting 300rwkw and what you are intending to do with the car.

So what do you want to do with the car? If you just want to slap a big turbo on a car to say " I once slapped a big turbo on a stock RB25 " then no problem'o it's very strange but, what ever you like is fine.

If you are actually thinking about some sort performance goal then there might be some better suggestions to go your way. Don't want to see you do the usual merry go round alot get caught on with cars. :laugh:

you want 400 horsepower while still having stock suspension, breaks and internals

i'd seriously look at doing at least the breaks if you want that much power

you can get 350 horsepower from a low mount turbo setup easily, just need fuel pump, ecu and injectors

my car makes 300 at the rear tyres and still has stock injectors

you will spend a lot of money for a huge laggy turbo that will get your car defected as soon as your bonnet is popped open when you dont need to.

and you havent mentioned what your want to do with the car. If its just for street use then your wasting your time, there is no need at all for that kind of setup for a street car

you will do what you decide in the end but you will save a lot of money if you just put on a bigger low mont turbo that will bolt straight on in a day that will still make awesome power and will be good to drive on the street.

Yes very valid points.

I started from scratch with this car and made it look the way i wanted. I dont really want to have to sell or swap for another one with power and internal strength i desire.

280kw would be very much desired but nothing below 260. Ideally a 2835 pro s would have been perfect but there basically 4000grand now, 6 , months ago it was about 2600.

i have ecu and pump so all i would need would be injectors and z32 plus turbo setup.

I really dont no anymore i might just hold back and sit on it.

Yes very valid points.

I started from scratch with this car and made it look the way i wanted. I dont really want to have to sell or swap for another one with power and internal strength i desire.

280kw would be very much desired but nothing below 260. Ideally a 2835 pro s would have been perfect but there basically 4000grand now, 6 , months ago it was about 2600.

i have ecu and pump so all i would need would be injectors and z32 plus turbo setup.

I really dont no anymore i might just hold back and sit on it.

Nothing wrong with thinking about it :)

The good news is that by the looks you may have started from scratch but, you still aren't very far from it ecconomically speaking.

Something interesting to consider, believe it or not it will still cost you alot less to go buy a car with all the power fruit you could want (dare I say even an R33 GTR) and then transform it cosmetically into this car you have now if the look you have is somehow unique. By the time you are finished with getting the 280rwkw on this one (including all the necessary bits like an engine build /brakes/suspension etc.) you could have bought that very nice White HKS demo R33 GTR for sale and painted it black etc. We are maybe talking $40k over time but, there are plenty of punters around in GTST's who when totaling up bills that they will find they spent more than that and to end up with alot less. Remember power is addictive and more power means everything needs to be upgraded eventually.

It's the cheap way to get everything you want in the car 'including' the looks. Lets face it you haven't exactly fabricated anything on your car by hand have you? If not you can replicate the look on any R33 pretty easy and compared with the turbo spend, very cheaply too.

Nothing wrong with keeping the car you love but, ask yourself if it's just this car or is it the type of car?

Edited by rev210

for the price of a hi flow

wouldnt a low mount garret on stock manifold/dump be wiser?

and rev210 is very wise :)

80% of people on here wont do what your doing on there cars

coz we all know its money we wont get back, instead we encourage others to "go for it"

usually happens when you have mates edging you on even when your broke

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...