Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if 243Hp @ the wheels on 10psi with the current setup is decent as i just got a dyno tune today and not sure what i should expect out of my stock turbo. So if you got a stock turbo or running an safc cos i'd like to see how much i can squeeze out my safc.

could you post your dyno results! dyno graphs also if available =)

mods are

-autobahn fmic

-3" hks dragger

-walbro pump

-apexi induction

-safc2

cheers

post-54106-1225980503_thumb.jpg

I got my car tuned yesterday And she pulled 179KW ( 240hp )

Running-

Blitz Intercooler

APEXi RSM Metre

APEXi SAFC metre

Splitfire Coilpacks

Full Jasma 3" Stainless exhaust

Only running standard boost till i get a Boost controller...

Yeah that right on the money having a power fc with those mods wont make alot of difference power wise.

Bumping up to 12-14psi wont improve power on stock turbo, wouldnt be good for turbo either. It will improve mid range however.

^

^

280hp would be bs for these mods John

280hp would be bs for these mods John
beg the differ seen plenty of "happy" 33's make 270 272 276 278 hp on many occasions just depends of where you go, you all know the story...

next mods should be

high flow cat

pfc

z32 afm

bosch pump (get rid of the walbro item but it will do for now)

decent clutch if not changed already..

i have around 200rwkw on a stock turbo ran on a mainline dyno . i know running 13 psi isn't great for it but hasn't died yet. waiting for turbo to choke it self soo i have a good excuse to install my new one in. but still waiting for it to die :D and its not showing any signs so far of it giving up.

put it on a happy dynodynamics dyno and u will get 280hp on stock turbo.

Edited by tets

have you got a graph showing a/f mix? its sounds pretty right but you could bump it up to 12psi for a little extra power. mine made 200kw on 12psi but I have a jap remaped ecu picking up the timming.

very happy!!!

after the tune, to be honest i wasn't very happy at all with the results because the car felt like it pulled more before the tune.

i thought to myself.."this cant be, it's just been tuned..the car can only get better not worst"

not being able to convince myself i got the tools out after work and popped the bonnet open.

- intercooler piping..check! (all tight)...

- vacuum lines had no apparent cracks and also sprayed a little amount of water, no bubbling..UNTIL i got to the bov vacuum line,

few bubbles starting to appear, looked closer and it had alot of cracks and visible wearing. cut a piece off and refitted, and then also saw that the hoseclamp wasn't tightened. it was LOOSE, i could pull it right off.

- stock bov..wiggled it around abit, what the? its shaking and then pop went the top bolt into my coilpacks, got the sucker and tightened it back on.

- everything else seemed fine so i went for a drive

it pulls like a train now!!!!

not sure why my tuner didnt pick it up though?

quite angry cos now it means it was just a waste of a tune..would it be best to get another tune?

Edited by Richy08

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...