Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys

i have recently found that there is a misfire in my r33 gts-t at about 6500rpm under load in first gear runing at 6psi

when i run it at 10psi the problem gets worse and does it at about 4000, then 5000 then 6000 rpm.

it feels very similar to when you hit the rev limiter only you feel it the once.

the only mods are k&n pod filter with cai, turbo smart boost controler (swichable) and i have only just put a full 3'' exhaust on this week.

anyone know what this problem could be or any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24544-big-mis-in-r33/
Share on other sites

ok Robo ive done the search and what u say about the safc sounds good. but if the fuel dumping is my problem could this be fixed by simply turning the boost down?

how much would it cost me for a safc and a good tune?

i do want to put in an apexi power fc in my car soon, so would i be wasting my time and money buying the safc? also my car is an auto so i dont know if i can use an apexi power fc?????????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24544-big-mis-in-r33/#findComment-524723
Share on other sites

i have the exact same prob and so do 2 of my other mates. i am getting mine fixed atm and one of my other mates has just had his done. it has to do with the coil packs being stuffed/cracked. the cover that is over the top of the coil packs in the 33's isnt exactly the best when it comes to ventilation of heat. i am getting bosch coil packs put in. and i run with the cover off in the mean time. the bosch packs don't fit under the factory cover, so they get mounted externally of the cover and are alot cheaper. :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24544-big-mis-in-r33/#findComment-524850
Share on other sites

robo

thanks for the info. i turned my boost down to 6 psi and the problem isnt as bad, but it is still there. it missfires at 6500 rpm, just before gear change. if it still does it with the boost down to 6psi this leads me to think it may be something else because its only just started to do it also.(within the last week)

or do you think i should just get a safc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24544-big-mis-in-r33/#findComment-526296
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...