Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was reading about flow testing injectors, and came across two different articles

that mention the higher the fuel pressure in the rail, the higher the (tested) injectors

flow. For example, a 440cc subaru injector that was "de-capped" flowed at 500cc

using the standard pressure equipment, but when the guy doubled the pressure

and tested just one (because the machine could not test all at higher psi),

it flowed at over 800cc!

And then obviously the higher boost pressure the higher fuel rail pressure is

needed to overcome and maintain the same fuel pressure at the injector tip.

So if your injectors are near max duty cycle, why not just increase fuel rail pressure?

and.. how can injector sizing be an exact science if flow rates change according

to boost pressure and/or fuel rail pressure?

So if your injectors are near max duty cycle, why not just increase fuel rail pressure?

Within limits, you can do just that - a lot of people do it in order to avoid changing injectors.

There are a few limitations to consider, but the main ones would be:

* At a higher rail pressure, a given fuel pump will not be able to flow 'as much' fuel.

Which is exactly opposite to what you want (delivery of more fuel).

Fuel pumps have flow ratings at certain pressures; you need to make sure that your pump can supply the required litres per hour at the desired rail pressure.

* A fuel system is designed (OEM) for a certain pressure + a safety margin.

Exceeding the design limits by more than a certain amount can result in all kinds of exciting stuff e.g. hose or connector failure.

Since it's fuel we're talking about, that rapidly becomes a lot more exciting once the fuel hits e.g. a hot motor.

A stock GTR fuel system runs about 43psi + boost (say 56psi max pressure).

I believe there are a number of folks running 29psi-ish boost on stock fuel hoses+rail; meaning about 72psi max pressure.

So anecdotal evidence is the stock fuel system can take at least an extra 36% pressure without failing (I don't know whether anyone's tested to failure).

and.. how can injector sizing be an exact science if flow rates change according

to boost pressure and/or fuel rail pressure?

Manifold pressure (boost) is pushing back against the fuel system pressure when the injector's open.

The fuel system on a GTR increases rail pressure 1:1 with boost so that the net effect of adding boost is zero - increased boost pressure == increased fuel pressure.

This means that the amount of flow is determined by the original base rail pressure (43psi or so).

Injector flow rates are at "a given pressure" (think it's 3bar, or 43.5psi).

So yes, increasing base rail pressure beyond the given standard pressure will allow a given injector to flow "more".

Hope this helps,

Saliya

that helps, thanks.

So if you are over 90% on injectors you can get some extra

headroom by getting an adjustable fuel regulator and increasing

the fuel rail pressure.. That would be give extra headroom..

But that isn't going to turn 555 cc injectors into 740 cc injectors ..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstah, no, coilovers aren't illegal, especially as a bolt straight in. The illegal part will be if they're altering suspension geometry beyond factory limits, or the ride height is not legal.   Sounds like the blue slipper just didn't want to deal with any later possibility of mods appearing on the car.
    • The problem has always been that coilovers are able to be adjusted, almost at any time, to be too low. Most people who ever get/got defected for/with coilovers were actually afoul of the minimum ride height rule. So the interpretation by cops/inspectors was always that it is pointless to allow numpty to raise his coilovers and get the car inspected/cleared, then just drop them back down again as soon as they get around the corner from the inspection station.  This led to the interpretation that they were illegal unless rendered such that they can't be adjusted (ie, collars welded to the body, that sort of thing). That may or may not have ever actually been the official line, but I'm pretty sure it's not considered to be a solution these days. Coilovers themselves fall under clause 3.2 b of that manual, because they are an "installation of a variable ride height system" and they don't fit the exclusions in that clause (which point to air springs and other pneumatic adjusters). So, as per previous statements, they require engineering cert to be legal on the road. Once you have such cert, provided you do not adjust them outside the height range covered by the cert, you are OK. Without, you have an unroadworthy vehicle.
    • Here E10 is the cheapest fuel. And general advice is to not use it unless you hate your car. From what I remember it clogs up stuff in the fuel system or injectors?  With US/Canada being E10 across the board, does that mean that all fuel there is terrible?
    • Sorry, are coilovers ACTUALLY ILLEGAL in NSW? They aren't in Vic, as long as they retain 70% of stock travel and the car is above 100mm off the ground. Does NSW actually have a law making coilovers actually illegal? RWC/Blue Slip/Engineering people not knowing the actual f**king laws boils my blood. Demand them to point to the documentation that states a coilover is illegal. (it may exist in NSW ) Edit: I checked. They aren't. https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-infosheet-light-vehicle-modifications-manual-suspension-and-ride-height.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...