Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a 1994 R33 GTS N/A, and my mate is striping his 1994 R33 GTST turbo. what i was thinking is

if i buy his complete engine, gearbox, turbo and all with the complete wiring loom and ecu etc, and i get all its fuel system and its exhuast system, and its diff, pretty much his whole drive train from engine to diff and everything inbetween

my question is, would everything bolt in ok? like the diff etc,

and if i change all the wiring loom from the N/A wiring loom and ecu to turbo wiring loom and ecu, should just be a take out and put in job right?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/248853-turbo-engine-into-a-na/
Share on other sites

its a massive amount of work which can be very expensive and time consuming, it will work with some slight modifications here and there but at the end of the day why would you, your better off getting your mates car and when resale time comes whos going to want to buy a n/a converted skyline when theres a million turbos out there.

yer yer i see where everybody is coming from but can't buy his car it was witen off from the side. and cos he is a good mate and he is moving ovr seas for abit soon he is selling me the parts cheap, i don't care about the cost and the work involved as im a machinice, i just need to know will it all fit???. and if i want to sell the car ill make it back to a N/A and sell the turbo gear

You will need to cut holes for the intercooler piping. If its a FMIC, you will need to do the normal things required to mount that.

If it comes with a tuneable ECU. Do this.

Get as much as you can off your friend.

Install injectors into your 25de

bolt on turbo manifold and turbo

pipe up the water and oil lines.

install intercooler

get your 25de+t tuned and drive it till it blows (if it ever blows), then when it does, you have a 25det motor spare.

25de+t's are bloody good!

read the green text below.

Edited by Tezzah

As you said, if it blows...and you'd have to be running stupid boost or flogging the balls off it at every intersection for that to happen!

Using a DET engine of course means not having to tap in oil lines in the engine, but if you're confident with doing it then yeah go for it.

If you do the bolt on, you'll be swapping everything else over from the GTStanyway, so only difference is you'll have a more responsive turbocharged engine, the gearbox and all handle the turbo conversion better than a R33 GTS with a bolt on job as it's designed for a turbo car.

I see a number of possibilities too with this scenario...like Tezzah said, keep the engine spare and possibly not need it? or you could sell the engine to fund mods/recoupe the expense of the conversion. Or budget permitting, while you have an accessible engine, do an engine rebuild! You can take your sweet time with it not having to deal with having a car off the road, meanwhile everything else will already be there like exhaust piping etc when you're ready to swap the engine over. At least you'll then have had a DET engine to start with for the rebuild and dropping in high compression forged pistons and everything else that goes with a rebuild, you can still keep your high compression and have one mean RB25DET!

Edited by N-DAWG
Using a DET engine of course means not having to tap in oil lines in the engine, but if you're confident with doing it then yeah go for it.

I didnt have to tap oil/water lines for my 20de. Is this not the case for the 25de ?

Oil inlet = blanking bolt

Oil Drain = Blanking nut thing.

Water line to block = blanking bolt.

Water line to the inlet side was tricky, i installed the Y piece off a donor 20det motor(on the inlet side), which you then plump up the line that goes around the back of the head (inbetween the firewall).

That was by far the hardest thing in my whole conversion. The rest was eeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzz.

Edited by Tezzah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...