Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I came across a place that sells a ton of high end turboes dual ball bearing and i saw a gt2510 and got thinkin. My plan which i already have a turbo and z32 MAF for will probably spool at 4500rpm (to4e). I recall many bashings over the past year of guys making and or thinking of running twin gtr or rb20 turboes on an rb20 with absolutely no good news other then the novelty of it. Literally double the rpm to make boost was hammered in as fact. But what about turboes small enough and free moving enough to make it finally make sense(or in the ballpark).

I know theirs a gigantic bullsh1t factor in doing an install like that but how bad would it really be considering how sluggish a to4e will be comming onto boost. I enjoy doing things differently and making whatever i do work out better in the end modified. Twin tiny dual ball bearing garretts must at the very least give more torque sooner, thoes twins maxed right out should only push 500bhp max maybe a bit more or less. A gt3076r would be ideal but is their any love out their for a set of scooter worthy twins??????

o yea, i run an 8000rpm redline

Edited by LedZepLen
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249943-twin-dbb-gt2510r-rb20/
Share on other sites

Twin turbos on a rb20 has been done once here...can't remember who it was though...results weren't the best but then again the setup wasn't right and was far from optimized...i'm a 20 fan too and used to run one...personally...even though it would be a cool project...you're better off slapping on a medium sized single and live with the lack of down low response...even with the smallest of the BB turbos a rb20 will still be lacklustre till about 3000-3500rpm...so if its never gonna be good down low then make sure it sings up high...

Or go 2JZ like i have... :P

Dual BB GT30 on a rb20 sings like a bitch - 235kw at 15psi, just takes 4400rpm to hit it. Pants meter off the charts - hits 180 from 120 in seconds...

Down low, the humble GTS keeps up - on boost its wild

Nothing wrong with lag, worse is blowing your full load of spool too soon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...