Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The JMS R33 RB25DET has had a little bit of work on the exhaust ports and a tomi cam inserted on the exhaust side. The intake cam is standard.

I am interested to see if it is still running 100% after the drift day with so much rev limiter bouncing. Towards the end of the day I swear I saw a little bit of smoke starting to appear from the exhaust.

Originally posted by -Joel-

Its not a street driven car.. or a 1/4 runner.

So its not that unbelievable.

Apparently the bottom end is a R34 RB25DET.

Not sure if they are any better or stronger?!?

Isnt it their drift car? If so it'd cop a fair bit of high end thrashing on the track. Drift cars get extremely hot, hence oil coolers, good venting etc etc

i for one am still going with the fact that tomei don't make 264's, if it's not on their website? which tomei put up themselves then i don't think they would make it :D maybe ya'll are using the tomei 260 degree camshafts

adria n:p

Don't you think for a moment that even though Tomei's website only lists their current 2003 catalogue they may have made some items not currently on offer? Going by your reasoning HKS never made a 2.8 liter kit with a spacer plate, nor any non-lcd boost controllers in the EVC range...

yo doughboy, i looked up tomei 264 cams ages ago(2002) and i just looked em up recently(2003) and it says the same shit okay

fair enough they might not list everything yeah, don't have to be a knobshiner when making ur point yeah?

adrian :P

SydneyKid, I was wrong. They put in Iskenderian Springs as well. Which, as you may know, makes no difference to the output cause it would have made almost the same power with those springs and stock cams.

Listen champ, read the zoom article which has the GTiR special in it. The car is in there. It had some decent hardware on it too in terms of turbo, cooler, fuel system, management etc. This all determines the engine's ability to make use of the new cams. (I hope you knew this)

But if your engine is as 'tuff' as you make it out to be, feel free to outline the deal again, write up a contract what-have-you and you are definitely on.

Tell me the mods to your engine and external hardware, bolt in some stock cams with good springs to suit the new cams, bring it up and we'll run it. Switch the cams, degree them in, RE-TUNE the engine, and you will lose bud. Thats a guarantee.

Don't forget, you started this bitch fight by claiming I was wrong, so if you are keen enough to argue, feel free to come up. We just manufacture camshafts for our customers as best we can- and they work.

Springs go for around (Don't quote me, cause I'm a bit boozed) $500 I think. Could be less could be more.

We make the retainers at work. Titanium is not suprisingly quite a bit dearer than steel. Our metal selection is quite good and the steel ones work a treat. But if you're really serious about revs, then we can do Titanium.

Do us a favour? Call on Monday at work to get prices please. I just used my standard ones and modified them a touch. But we are selling a few cam and spring packages now, so I guess I'll design some retainers and use them!

Luke

Ivan Tighe Engineering (Tighe Cams)

3271 6001

Hi lukevl, I know the article, in a GTiR s it’s an SR not an RB. Before you agree to this I strongly suggest you do a bit of research on SR versus RB in the camshaft area. Our experience has been that SR's standard camshafts are very very mild in comparison to standard RB camshafts. They benefit a whole lot more from camshaft upgrades than any RB I have had experience with.

Let's make sure you know what you are getting into here......

The 3.1 litre engine is on the engine stand, it has;

JE forged Pistons

Total Seal gapless rings

Carillo forged conrods

ARP rod bolts, head and main studs

9 to 1 compression ratio

o'ringed block

HKS exhaust manifold

Garrett GT3040

GTR Intercooler (PWR tube and fin core)

Clevite bearings

N1 GTR oil pump

N1 GTR water pump

Winged and baffled sump

RB26 head, throttle bodies and plenum

Head is ported and both manifolds are matched

(it flows 645 bhp on the flow bench at 2 bar vacuum)

Iskendarian valve springs

Titanium retainers

Tomei head gasket

Jun adjustable cam pulleys

Standard R32 GTR camshafts

Power FC ECU

I haven't run this one on the engine dyno yet, but it's older sister (there are 5 in the current batch) using a Motec M48 Pro made 625 bhp at 7,250 rpm using Elf LMS. Noting that these are circuit race engines, so they need a 3,000 rpm wide power band.

So, my understanding of our deal is this;

I run my engine up on the engine dyno and establish a base power graph (no reason it should be much different to its sister at 625 bhp). We change the camshafts only, retune it (change whatever you like, but no boost increase). If it makes 150 bhp more (that's 775 bhp) then I pay you for the camshafts and $1K for you personally. If it makes less than 775 bhp I get the camshafts for free.

Is this your understanding? Have I missed anything?

Timing is a little tricky as we have a lot of work on before the Bathursts (1,000 k and 2 Hour), but then it gets a bit quieter. Mid December would be good for me, is that OK for you?

I meant the Zoom MAG with the GTiR special in it. The article on the Calais with the RB in it is in that mag. It kinda made sense.

If I knew how to quote posts, I would highlight these points

1. 140hp (NOT 150) was gained at the wheels.

2. This was made as an improvement over stock RB25DET camshafts.

3. You said they won't make more than 40hp. Now we have to beat 150hp?? Talk about raising the bar champ.

4. The power increase was within the Turbo's HP range. Its kinda hard to increase HP by heaps when you are already maxing out the airflow of the GT3040.

5. My comment was that the RB25 in question could easily go from 450atw to 500 with the right camshafts.

6. Stop piss-farting about and changing your mind.

The bottom line is, our cams are good and they will improve the HP of your engine by way more than 40hp which you claimed was the max.

Your post was not correct, you did miss everything. If you were serious you would understand what camshafts can do for an engine and not just use 'forgies and more boost'

Speak to you when you call us to organise a time and venue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...