Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 273
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

wouldn't mind asking if there is any discussion of mod plates in south australia? I have no doubt that it works in Queensland?

this is something a local MP could bring up the place that counts. i for one would be all for mod plates

this is something a local MP could bring up the place that counts. i for one would be all for mod plates

That would solve alot of the reasonless defects going on, and keep us honest.

why dont we chip in and hire a hall or something so we can all attend and ask questions like they do on 60 minutes etc etc ?

that way everyone gets the right information straight from the source

It wouldn't be a meeting for everyone to attend hun, it would be a meeting where some selected members can voice our opinions. There will probably only be Neil and another officer there.

QUOTE (DamageInc @ 13 Jan 2009, 06:08 PM) *

why dont we chip in and hire a hall or something so we can all attend and ask questions like they do on 60 minutes etc etc ?

that way everyone gets the right information straight from the source

It wouldn't be a meeting for everyone to attend hun, it would be a meeting where some selected members can voice our opinions. There will probably only be Neil and another officer there.

I could just see neil rolling up to what looks like a mob lynching and half the SAU members there, now that would get us somewhere. :)

well, the system as it is doesnt work.

IF you could garner support from a Member of parliment to attend this meeting, it could possibly be the start to better things for the SA motor enthusiests

it only takes the initiation of 1 to move the mountain

I agree with Ben.. i seem to be increasingly reading about inconsistent and unnecessary defects being handed out. Serious clarification to what is deemed as illegal and defetable items needs to happen. However, if someone does get defected for something obviously illegal, then they should just accept what happened and deal with it.

I would like to know how officers are trained when it comes to defecting vehicles.

im not so sure i trust their pressence to be in a positive maner, but on our side if they did go on blitz mode it will ruin any chance they have of creating a police relationship with any car club for quite some time.

not so sure that would bother them though

i just thought id mention again they can bring up a plate number on the pc and flag it to be pulled over for defect next time the cars spotted, friend thats a cop mentioned that 1. this would allow them to play it off as unrelated to the cruise.

it is a very interesting prospect however, good luck guys

I'm quite happy to work and cooperate with police... but not with neil. I think i made myself pretty clear that i was defected for stuff that didn't exist, which was later confirmed by guy at regency, and not to mention all the abuse i had to take from this guy. No, but sorry, I'll pass on this. I'm not bad mouthing him, just setting the facts straight.

I'm so sick of hearing this "a cop can defect you on suspicion if he wants to..."

HOW is this legal?! How can they possibly do this?! Is it really a law?!

What, so it's okay to pull over someone, spend 30 minutes looking for a possible defect - can't find one, so they blatantly abuse their level of power and think "Yeah, why not" and slap on a sticker for a suspicion of defect!!!

Well, if that's the case... I suspect all those people down the beach I saw tonight have committed a murder... but they can't be sent to court on suspicion of murder, can they?! No. So why is it that they're allowed to say, after thoroughly checking over a innocent car, say "Yeah, I reckon you're packing a set of twin low-mounts in this beast... I'm going to send you to Regency" and then slap on the sticker to a little Toyota Corolla?! It's a slap in the face.

It's not right.

Can this please be raised? The laws/opinions/how often it happens, with this suspicion of defect crap?

Can someone also ask in what regards are we allowed to voice our opinion when having the car checked over?

I once got defected for a boost gauge on my dash in the crash zone. Okay, fair defect. But the cop said "You have 2 tacho's here mate..." and I said "Oh, that's a boost gauge" and he instantly came back with "Don't give me attitude mate. I know what I'm talking about okay. If you proceed with that, I'll make you tow this car to the inspection."

How is that fair?! He asked me a question, I co-operated with no attitude, and I got that?!

Are we permitted to even speak or make corrections when having the car looked over?!

I personally think SAU is one of the more mature clubs, if we could get some feedback from the police on what modifications they permit (providing there is some consistency around this) i'd be more than happy to oblige. I've got no quarms with our local police, they've saved me in situations far more serious than this, and gotten to know a few personally... i'd really appreciate an opportunity to work closer with them also.

It may also be worthwhile contacting our Minister for Transport Pat Conlon for his input.

This is cool to have a response. Tho I know that some cars have been defected for ADR approved items (such as braided brake lines) which begs the question whether there are more laws onto of the ADR's (which as I understand it, are separate to state roadworthiness guidelines - federal roadworthiness guide is rather thin compared to the state one)...

I'd like to know if the police are aware of any plans to nationalise the roadworthiness scheme rather than having a huge disparity between the states. I here rumors here and there but nothing concrete.

I'd also like to know what the police's input into motor racing venues are, given the debate in the other thread about WA's motorplex

Would be curious to see if Neil has any statistics about makes and models of cars defected, to see if there's patterns or not, as I wonder if the old shitboxes attract as much attention as imports.

-D

That last question would be a good one to put to him even if it's just to put some of your minds at rest.

seems to me your asking permission to run cruises, with illegal cars, and not get any defects?

its the law, seriously, fighting it will do nothing. if you drive illegal cars be prepared to pay the price.

surely im not the only one that thinks this?

Correct Tim.

The answer to his expectations lies in the sentence extracted from his response to Nene.

I inspect several vehicles a day and those who do not meet ADR's receive a defect.

Now he's clearly a traffic constable that may not have an issue with the SAU cruises as long as the vehicles that attend comply with ADR's and the members comply with road regs. He may even turn a blind eye initially to a minor defect (not a major one) after making an effort to point it out to you, but you will then be required to attend to that matter immediately.

The one thing you shouldn't overlook is that Neil is not only obliged but required by law and his superiors to perform his paid duty.

Nene well done for your effort, Benny Boy must be very proud of you.

+1 SLED and Nightcrawler

-D

yep, need level headed ppl, that are articulate.

sled, nightcrawler and nene.

i would be happy to be represented by those three... wont need any more than that cos i reckon that would be counter-productive, no need to show up in force.

yep, need level headed ppl, that are articulate.

sled, nightcrawler and nene.

i would be happy to be represented by those three... wont need any more than that cos i reckon that would be counter-productive, no need to show up in force.

Thanks Carl,

I also believe Heslo should be there. He helped out with writing the email last night, and was the one who prompted me to write a second letter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...