Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did they make a 94 model R33 GTR?

They made 32's til 94 which was the v-spec one but did they start to make the 33's that year as well? I always thought they started in 95......

Reason I ask is someone has one for sale.

No they didn't.

Oh and not all 94 GT-R's were V-spec.

You will probably find the bloke has made a mess of the dates. Get the numbers of the build plate & put it through fast for confirmation.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4418190
Share on other sites

Did they make a 94 model R33 GTR?

They made 32's til 94 which was the v-spec one but did they start to make the 33's that year as well? I always thought they started in 95......

Reason I ask is someone has one for sale.

well according to wik

the R33 GT-R was introduced in january 1995......as the 4th Generation GT-R

as well as the V-spec as well.

and the R32 GT-R V-SPEC II was introduced Febuary 14th 1994

but the R33 was introduced in 1993

he may have muddled the dates but make sure dude.........you dont wana buy a dudd...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4418444
Share on other sites

well according to wik

the R33 GT-R was introduced in january 1995......as the 4th Generation GT-R

as well as the V-spec as well.

and the R32 GT-R V-SPEC II was introduced Febuary 14th 1994

but the R33 was introduced in 1993

he may have muddled the dates but make sure dude.........you dont wana buy a dudd...

Exactly what he said.

The r33 gtr wasnt released till 1995 so he has either stuffed up with the dates or maybe something dodgey

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4418556
Share on other sites

I've got a 94 R32 GTR and it isn't a V-Spec...

Built in July 94.

yeah so? your missing the point.........

what it meant is that......the R32 GT-R V-spec was RELEASED, in 1994!!!! whilst the Standard GT-R was still on the market......get it?

same as the R34 GT-R... when the V-spec was introduced, you could still purchase the STANDARD GT-R brand new......get it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4418785
Share on other sites

Well, clearly something is wrong there..

No idea why the thumbs down and also why its impossible.

Paperwork, plates and all can confirm this.

lol i was just playing with ya

anyways...

obviously something went wrong with the compliance process....

how do you know the people didnt get things muddled up during compliance?

im pretty sure it states on the R32 GT-R Brochure that V-spec was released in 1994

so as babyskyline mentioned.....something might even be DOdgy...seller might have even bodged the books.

but if you think with your brain of it logically....

say Nissan released the R32 GT-R officially in 1994.................. what........all of a sudden they skipped the introduction of the R33 skyline GTS, GTS-T and skip the introduction of the R33 GT-R standard.....and wooooooooooop.................here you go R33 GT-R V-spec?!

like i said once again.....obviously something is suss......

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4418830
Share on other sites

Well, clearly something is wrong there..

No idea why the thumbs down and also why its impossible.

Paperwork, plates and all can confirm this.

Give me your chassis number and I'll plug it into FAST. The only thing I can guess is that they were built very late in '94 in preparation for the '95 release.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4418829
Share on other sites

Give me your chassis number and I'll plug it into FAST. The only thing I can guess is that they were built very late in '94 in preparation for the '95 release.

Thats the only thing that would make any sense because they would have to start producing them a a month or so before releasing them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4418887
Share on other sites

Yeah, all valid points, maybe there is something sus or a mix up during compliance.

I'll get the vin.

So, is it the problem that it is a v-spec or that it is a 94' R33 GTR at all..

Edited by Owgasm
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4418929
Share on other sites

Yeah, all valid points, maybe there is something sus or a mix up during compliance.

I'll get the vin.

So, is it the problem that it is a v-spec or that it is a 94' R33 GTR at all..

yeah iron will sort it out.

ok heres another bit of info from one of my sources....

May 1989 - R32 Shape released

August 1989 - R32 GT-R released (280ps RB26DETT)

August 1991 - R32 GTS25 released (RB25DE)

Febuary 1993 - R32 GT-R V-spec released

August 1993 - R33 shape released

Febuary 1994 - R32 GT-R V-spec II released <-- when the R33 shape was out, as you can see they bought out a V-spec II just a year before they bought an R33 GT-R

January 1995 - R33 GT-R released

May 1998 - R34 shape released

January 1999 - R34 GT-R released

perhaps my suggestion was that the dates was that the GTR 1994 you know of....may have been built displaying the "date of manufacture"

so technically, its a 1995 model car when the first owner bought it brand new in the JDM and it just displays on the plate 1994.

so the with all the paper works.....mechanics, insurance companies, auction bidders, importers etc etc just went by whatever it said under the bonnet.........

makes sense though

but now come to think of it......

i recall seeing "1998 R34 GT-Rs" for sale...

and refering to the info above, it wasnt released in JDM at that stage...but once again a date of manufacture plate.

so this is obviouslt the same thing happening...

well at least you know that the 1998 GTR R34 & the 1994 GTR R33 is the ealiest and first of the first GT-Rs on the front row......

Edited by eeiko321
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256400-r33-gtrs/#findComment-4419091
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...