Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey umm i was contemplating buying a car with this plenum mod, but didn't buy it

Now only recently i have been speaking to this guy who is pretty switched on with flow and porting etc. Who is helping me get my car back on the road.

now when i take my engine out we are going to get the inlet manifold bead blasted, then flow matched and then they machine the hole in the plenum for the TB cos it is actually smaller. he even spoke of making it elliptical shaped something to do with flow to #1 and #6. Then the zorst manifold gets cleaned up inside the runners (die grind) and then bead blasted too (mainly all this does is drops zorst temps and relieve turbo).

Now we have decided to use one of those PWR 'Barrel' Coolers (water to air). Original idea was to rotate comp housing on turbo to face down and have the barrel mounted horizontal beside radiator. on further inspection in the S13 engine bay its gonna take some cool thinking to fit it in this position.

Then i thought why not have a front facing TB and have the barrel behind the bumper?

and in my mind it seems right, but i don't know a great deal about flow or anything but if i got the TB front mounted then had the manifold port matched and bead blasted surely it would work?

let me know otherwise i will stick with the other way and cut the shit outta my engine bay

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

this mod is spot on for rb20/25's although i would mount throttle body directly onto manifold to increase throttle response further.

there will be no lean-out in runners because,

pressure in system is equal whether at compressor outlet, intercooler or inlet runner.

compressed air reacts like liquid/hydraulics therefore if each inlet runner is of equal length and pressure is the same each runner will flow equally.

so the big gains will come from your tuner putting more fuel into the engine earlier, 2m less plumbing adds to a ton of response, reducing heat soak and increasing turbo efficency.

  • 1 year later...

Now there's lateral thinking for you - Interesting concept - How are the results RNS11Z ?? Who made the plenum ?? Looks like good work !

Conceptually, there would be good flow distribution with this type of plenum !

Well done !

Cheers,

Does anyone know what part of the stock rb25 inlet manifold makes it restrictive?

Would extrude honing the lower half and removing the odd shaped bumps in the top half benefit much?

Has anyone used a RIPS plenom yet?

PS: Aiming for 450rwhp in a 1200 kg car running a RB30DET.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...