Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I like the pic with the chick on the bike. It straight away grabs my attention. Good history brushing :stupid:

But really harsh sun light and shadows. Would like to see shots of that series however.

Now the black cars such as the audi and honda are way to dark and lacking any detail.

Esp the audi shot. I noticed your hi ISO for that shot so im assuming you didnt have a tripod?

If thats the case perhaps go to a more lit area?

Some really harsh reflections on some of the other shots like basti has mentioned. Perhaps take the pictures later on in the day or get a circular polarizer filter.

Im in no way bagging out your work, but giving my honest opinion for improvements that i feel will help in time round.

But you dont have to listen to me either :)

  • 1 month later...

Yeah i was thinking the same as Sidd about the darker car photos.

This may just be me (and in no way am i an expert..in fact have no idea about taking photos)

However the commodore photos look too digital..if that makes any sense...like it doesn't look like a photo...looks like a cgi image or something

.........had a look - how can I say this diplomatically - it reminds me of one of my rellies who has x number of cameras etc and .........well I better not go any further..............

you got any other hobbies your better at?

you got any other hobbies your better at?

Damn that's a bit harsh.

The dark Audi photo is a little too dark for my liking but I can see where you are going with it.

Do you have any other photos of the first car?

From the rear light it looks to me to be a new model Toyota Celica but I've never seen that wide arch kit before.....

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...