Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm trying now to host it so you can see it better, It wouldn't let me post a bigger pic, I don't really know where your going with this but If I've made a mistake with one of the figures by a few kw thats all it is, is a mistake I tried to calculate it as best I could

Hi Buster, I am not going to scratch around for minor errors in data , just trying to get an understanding, data is my thing remember. From what I can see there is a pretty goodly amount of breathing from 5500 rpm to 7500 rpm. Is there camshafts, porting, inlet and exhaust manifolds etc holding the airflow up?

Originally posted by raist60

GHEY?! Why come in here, single out sydneykid, ask for his opinion then go ****ing nutz when he doesnt agree with you?

Some people like torquey track suited power

Some people like peakey drag suited power

Its a compromise like everything else in this fun game we play. It doesnt matter what someone else thinks of your dyno graph / quart mile times / turbo / haircut / makeup as long as you enjoy your car.

true, there is no good and bad turbo otherwise one company would be 'the be all' and the rest would be bunkrupt, its all to do with preference. But I think what is being said that Trust turbos are not a TRUCK turbo, they are performance turbos which have proven themself. And in Busters case he has a proved it.

Nothing to do with these averages and genius maths figures, i mean damn as long as it does what he wants it to do, and produces good results, its fine right? there might even be be better but everything comes at a cost.

It has tomei 264, 8mm lift cams, It also has a greddy plenum as far as I know its got some description of head work as it was listed in the specs when I bought the car but I have no idea what is done

Other then the plenum (that you don't think much of from reading your previous posts) its pretty well the same mod wise as HPI R34 I thought

i dont want to compare each others prices here.

u know its a material world, people would rather spend the extra dough and product with a name which is also proven. The Beauty of buying say a trust turbo or any name brand is its off the shelf(bolt-on), make it as easy as possible and at the end of the day you know what to expect.

it might not interest people who enjoy life researching every aspect, ins and outs, pro's and con's. but at the end of the day everyone has a different market.

You can get someone to do it all for you etc, and run the risk of them ripping you off, or go in with a set price full instructions and try yourself.

Goes for buying a computer, it would be alot cheaper building it yourself installing the software, than going to Dick Smith/Harvey Norman and buying one off the shelf, but then again everyone may not have the knowledge and experience you do.

referring to previous posts man...i just dont think there is anything wrong with the TD-06, to each there own...and you know that these turbos are much more affordable, especially in the maitanence dep.

and everything comes at a cost...if thats loosing that extra 0.9999~% then there must be something that makes up for it right?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...