Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK so the longer the duration the later power will be in the rev range and a lumpier idle. Is there any disadvantage from going higher lift ?? 8.5mm on my 264's seems abit low. Would there be much advantage from going to 9.5mm lift? Without upgrading springs that is. Power comes on very hard at 6000rpm with the 264's. I wouldn't want it any later. My head is also majorly ported. Is higher or lower lift better suited to a ported RB25?

Sorry for all the questions but Julian's 21st Century Performance book doesn't help much.

Hi Boosted, I posted thsi a while ago and I think it answers your questions....

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi guys, it's been a while since we had a thread on camshafts. Camshaft upgrades need to be considered, not for the max power increase they give at one single rpm point, but for the improvement in average power over the rpm range that you intend to use. A few rules of thumb that I use;

If you intend to use 7,000 to 9,500 rpm, something around 272 to 288 degrees would be the go. For 5,500 to 8,000 rpm, around 260 to 272 and for 4,500 to 7,500 rpm then 248 to 260 is the go. That's a simplification, but you get the idea.

I should point out that you need to be realistic in your rpm choice, most people grossly overestimate their rpm usage and then are disappointed with the result.

So much for timing, now moving to lift. I have a personal philosophy that says go for the highest lift you can get with the timing as per above. You need to be aware that anything over 9.5 mm may require machining of the head to clear the lobes. It’s not a big job, a couple of minutes per lobe with the die grinder is all it takes. Can be done in the car, if you are careful with the swarf. In my opinion, anything over 10 mm will require upgrading the valve springs and changing to solid lifters in RB20/25’s.

Lastly, I never use camshafts that have a smaller PCD than standard, they put too much side load on the buckets. You can get offset followers, but why go to the expense when you can get standard PCD camshafts that don’t need them.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hope that helps

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

each wheel should be 360 degrees with 7.5 degrees per tooth.

Each cam wheel turns twice in relation to the crank....so 720- I am so confused. If each tooth is 7.5 degrees than 4 degrees retard relates to ~4mm, but if each tooth is 15degree than ~2mm is 4 degrees.

Someone please give me a definate. Going off the HKS Cam gear markings. 2mm(two marks) equals 4 degrees, But, on my OS cam gears 2 marks equals 4mm..........Ahhh So this 4 degrees retard equats to what... I read from another thread warpspeed said that 15degrees per tooth was correct.

help pls

Hi Boosted, I posted thsi a while ago and I think it answers your questions....

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi guys, it's been a while since we had a thread on camshafts.  Camshaft upgrades need to be considered, not for the max power increase they give at one single rpm point, but for the improvement in average power over the rpm range that you intend to use.  A few rules of thumb that I use;

If you intend to use 7,000 to 9,500 rpm, something around 272 to 288 degrees would be the go.  For 5,500 to 8,000 rpm, around 260 to 272 and for 4,500 to 7,500 rpm then 248 to 260 is the go.   That's a simplification, but you get the idea.

I should point out that you need to be realistic in your rpm choice, most people grossly overestimate their rpm usage and then are disappointed with the result.

So much for timing, now moving to lift.  I have a personal philosophy that says go for the highest lift you can get with the timing as per above.  You need to be aware that anything over 9.5 mm may require machining of the head to clear the lobes.  It’s not a big job, a couple of minutes per lobe with the die grinder is all it takes.  Can be done in the car, if you are careful with the swarf.  In my opinion, anything over 10 mm will require upgrading the valve springs and changing to solid lifters in RB20/25’s.

Lastly, I never use camshafts that have a smaller PCD than standard, they put too much side load on the buckets.  You can get offset followers, but why go to the expense when you can get standard PCD camshafts that don’t need them.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hope that helps

Hi sydneykid, thanks for the info. What in essence exactly would going from 8.5mm to 9.5mm lift on the same duration cam make to power. Would it make no difference to off power band? How much extra power would be expected?

Cheers matt

Each cam wheel turns twice in relation to the crank....so 720- I am so confused. If each tooth is 7.5 degrees than 4 degrees retard relates to ~4mm, but if each tooth is 15degree than ~2mm is 4 degrees.

Someone please give me a definate. Going off the HKS Cam gear markings. 2mm(two marks) equals 4 degrees, But, on my OS cam gears 2 marks equals 4mm..........Ahhh  So this 4 degrees retard equats to what... I read from another thread warpspeed said that 15degrees per tooth was correct.

help pls

sorry boosted

i think i may have been confused last night- and still am.. now i wanna know for sure..

so we've got each wheel which will have a total of 360 degrees...

after just having the engine apart, i noticed that the wheel on the crank is much smaller than those on the cams... so when taking into consideration the stages of the engine you would need one revolution of the crank to activate the inlet side cam.. then another to activate the exhaust side... which would mean that the crank has 2 revolutions to the each cam gears one..

so it looks to me now that you were right with 720 crank degrees for each cam...

conformation will definately be appreciated!

Hi sydneykid, thanks for the info. What in essence exactly would going from 8.5mm to 9.5mm lift on the same duration cam make to power. Would it make no difference to off power band? How much extra power would be expected?

Cheers matt

Sorry Matt, I am not sure I understand the first question, "Would it make no difference to off power band?"

Let me guess, you are asking about off boost performance. Well we have an RB25DET in an R34 GTT that makes more power EVERYWHERE from installing Tomei 260 Poncams (they work with the VVT). On boost, off boost, even at idle, it makes more power.

As for the second question, the average power increase from 4,000 rpm to 7,000 rpm was 30 rwkw with a max power increase of 18 rwkw. It starts to build boost 500 rpm earlier and reaches full boost (1.3 bar) 300 rpm earlier. The car feels alive to drive, it responds quickly to throttle inputs whether on boost or off.

I have never back to backed 8.5 mm versus 9.5 mm lift cams, but what I can say is the higher lift extends the high rpm power without decreasing the low rpm. The result is you end up with a wider power band, so average power is probably up 10 to 15 rwkw, but max power is maybe 5 to 10 rwkw up.

Hope that helps

hey sydney kid,

Iam looking for cams and camshafts for my rb25det soon. Is it ok if i pm at the time and ask you for advice. Iam marvelled at your indepthness into modifying cars ( i have spoken to you before. )

Thanks

Sentric -

Sorry Matt, I am not sure I understand the first question, "Would it make no difference to off power band?"

Let me guess, you are asking about off boost performance.  Well we have an RB25DET in an R34 GTT that makes more power EVERYWHERE from installing Tomei 260 Poncams (they work with the VVT).  On boost, off boost, even at idle, it makes more power.

As for the second question, the average power increase from 4,000 rpm to 7,000 rpm was 30 rwkw with a max power increase of 18 rwkw.  It starts to build boost 500 rpm earlier and reaches full boost (1.3 bar) 300 rpm earlier.  The car feels alive to drive, it responds quickly to throttle inputs whether on boost or off.

I have never back to backed 8.5 mm versus 9.5 mm lift cams, but what I can say is the higher lift extends the high rpm power without decreasing the low rpm.   The result is you end up with a wider power band, so average power is probably up 10 to 15 rwkw, but max power is maybe 5 to 10 rwkw up.

Hope that helps

Thankyou Sydneykid, that helps alot. Were the 260 Poncams 8.5mm lift?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...