Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

GTS-t VSPEC,

Quoting power figures does not mean anything to me at all. You can hardly compare the readouts taken from two workshops in the same suburb, let alone interstate. The shootout mode is gaining a lot of late attention to overcome this dilemna, but as i am not too familiar with it i don't know what to make of those figures as well.

Tell me what you or Rob77 achieved on the strip with the quoted figures and/so i can relate to them. I can put those against what i or my friends achieved and get a conclusion from it.

SydneyKid,

Does the humidty and and temperature have that much effect on the fuel requirements...? If you live in Queensland and the humidity is %70, do you need that much more legroom in your injector capacity ?

It kinda explains though, why i need 124lt/hour of fuel by those calculations, but actually use 194 lt/hour.

  • Replies 335
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by Emre

GTS-t VSPEC,

Quoting power figures does not mean anything to me at all. You can hardly compare the readouts taken from two workshops in the same suburb, let alone interstate. The shootout mode is gaining a lot of late attention to overcome this dilemna, but as i am not too familiar with it i don't know what to make of those figures as well.

Tell me what you or Rob77 achieved on the strip with the quoted figures and/so i can relate to them. I can put those against what i or my friends achieved and get a conclusion from it.

SydneyKid,

Does the humidty and and temperature have that much effect on the fuel requirements...? If you live in Queensland and the humidity is %70, do you need that much more legroom in your injector capacity ?

It kinda explains though, why i need 124lt/hour of fuel by those calculations, but actually use 194 lt/hour.

Even when I get a dragstrip time, which I will tonight, how can you compare it to a different car on a different track. There are too many variables. ie: kwinana in perth is slightly downhill or uphill (cant remember which one), each car will have different tyres which will effect traction and 60' times, the ambient temperature will be different (might only make a slight difference), the tracks will be prepped in different ways... they might skimp on the prep tonight and it might be slippery as buggery... dyno's are a tuning aid, sure the dragstrip will give you a better idea of the cars performance, but its hard to compare different strips and run dates.

the terminal speed will be a good indicator of the power.

At least the owners of each vehicle have a previous terminal speed as a refference, so I'm sure there will be quick validation of the power claims (as relative as they are to the particular car and dragstrip).

I am another who doesn't place alot of emphasis on the dyno as the sole performance indicator.However having had a ride in Robs car I feel confident there is a strong case for defending the power claims from that dyno when he visits the strip this evening.

Cheers

Dave

Hi Emre, I am not a strong believer in the 1/4 as a power indicator either. ET's are too dependant on traction and TS is too dependant on gearing.

An example;

I had a car with 425 rwhp, that was geared for 120 mph top speed. It did hi 11's but obviously at 120 mph TS. It redlined in top gear before the end of the 1/4. The same car with a higher diff ratio ie; geared for 140 mph top speed, did low 12's at 132 mph. The reasoning here is, of the 2 diff ratios available, one was too high and slowed the 1/4 time. We won on ET not on TS, so I went for the lower ratio.

So we have the same horsepower with 2 different ET's and 2 different TS's. How do I calcualte the horsepower of the engine with any accuracy from that data.

Want to get into weight? I know many have read this........

http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=776885

Step 1: Baseline

Curb Weight: 2,762 lbs

1/4 Mile:16.3 @ 84.0 mph

60-foot:2.9 sec.

0-60 mph:8.6 sec.

Step 7: Styling

Curb Weight:1,674 lbs

1/4 Mile:14.3 @ 93.2 mph

60-foot:2.6 sec.

0-60 mph:5.8 sec.

Now this car has not 1 horsepower more, but does a 2 seconds faster ET with a 9.2 mph higher TS.

Want to get into aerodynamics and ambient conditions? Me either.

In summary, I have yet to find a perfect method for accurately determining a car's horsepower.

I hear what you are saying about the gear ratios SydneyKid, but i don't think it is relevant to our scenario. Apart from the LS1 boys with their insanely short gearing in 6th, no one would bother to change their diff ratios on a daily driven car here. Imagine your fuel economy and changing gears like a truck, skipping every second gear.:D

I am very confident in saying that just about everyone here, keep their gear ratios to the factory spec and don't chop bits of their car to save 1000 pounds.

If GTS-t VSPEC and rob77 went to the track tonight and didn't crack 123-124 and 117-118 mph respectively, i don't have much faith in their quoted power figures.

Originally posted by Sydneykid

..... a good rule of thumb used by many in the automotive business is 1.7 bhp per cc of injector capacity.  Thus 1.7 * 6 * 370 = 377 bhp.

So, I'm still perplexed..........

Sydneykid, I am somewhat mystified too, as my injectors were at 82% duty with 203rwkw and stock fuel pump.

I think there must be something else going on here though, too many people I know have got more power than is theoretically possible with the stock injectors - here in adelaide both BOOSTD and Whatsisname have made over 250rwkw with stock injectors, BOOSTD uses a stock fuel pressure reg, and still has room on his injectors even now with 266rwkw - and is using less than 1 bar boost.

I have driven side by side with BOOSTD, me with a HKS 3037 and 550cc injectors, him with his hybrid and stock injectors - very similar output, and there was nothing in it when we were both on full boost.

Another thing is that whatsisname had his car tuned by the same guy I did, similar power figures, he had stock injectors, I have 550cc.

Why is it that when I say I made xxx amount of power and I had 550cc injectors - everyone accepts it, or at least doesnt challenge it, different person, same dyno, same tuner, stock injectors same output - no one believes it??? go figure.

You are right, it doesnt add up, I like it when things dont add up, as it means that my thinking is being challenged, and an opportunity to learn.

I would dearly love to know why and how, but at this stage all I know is it does happen, not how or why.

The dyno that Paul's car has been run on was tested correct, the same dyno that Rob's car was tuned on, both made what theoretically cannot be done, as people here have. And they arent the only ones who have done it.

There MUST be something in this....... it seems that by adding a high capacity fuel pump (the fuel reg isnt a common factor here) that the stock injectors flow well beyond what they 'should' flow. This is somewhat in line with the fact that alot of people have experienced overly rich mixtures purely by adding a larger fuel pump - which shouldnt theoretically happen as the fuel pressure reg shoud regulate the fuel pressure at a constant.

Ah well, perhaps no one will ever know.

I was on 100% Duty cycle when i made 387rwhp on pump fuel. I have a adjustable fuel pressure reg and a bosch motorsport 0444 (the 700hp) fuel pump. Yet when flowed side by side with another set of standard skyline injectors they both flowed the same @ 370cc. The injectors we tested made 402rwhp on another skyline using a td06-25g turbo (on12psi) and 40hp shot of nos. With out the gas and on 18psi it made 360rwhp (with a very similar fuel set up to mine). So i find it hard to believe for GTST V-spec to make 411rwhp from just turbo, pump, and computer. Then again i doubt myself highly because i dont know too much about skylines and there capabilities.

No different to rb20s, i have made 235rwkw with stock reg and run 113mph so that is about right, but most people say they are not big enough for that. Im running a 044 so it must help, but pushing injecors with the small pumps like others are doing is a little harder to believe

Emre, You should educate yourself a bit about the idea of shootout mode, the whole idea is that power figures should be comparable. And seeing as my dyno has been QA'd by Dyno Dynamics then I'm confident with the figure.

Mine has been dynoed at 266rwkw with 95% duty cycle. Standard injectors, Standard A/F meter (runs out of resolution around 4100rpm) Bosch Motorsport pump, very minor porting, Hybrid turbo( with stuff all boost -peaks at 18psi then drops to 13 ) Only one way to find out just how true it is! Drags for me Wednesday night....test out the new Nitto's =)

I used to think it was crap too but since reading that article and thinking about it I am convinced that in the not to far future all runs will be done in shootout mode as its a lot fairer and easy to see if someone is diddling the ramp rate etc

Hi guys, Shootout mode is SOFTWARE locking not HARDWARE locking, all the usual tricks still work perfectly. Want an extra 50 rwkw? No problems, three turns on the load cell adjuster. When finished, turn back 3 turns. DD guy turns up and checks calibration, guess what? Yep, she's 100% accurate.

Want another one? In Shootout mode the PC does temperature compensation. When it's a hot day it increaases the power reading, vice versa when cold. Wanna trick it? Easy stick the temp probe in cup of warm water while you do the power run. Bingo extra 15% rwkw.

Want another one?

Nah I think I made my point.

Sydneykid, I love your sceptical attitude, but I think I may have noticed the temperature probe in the hot water;) Yes you still can get unscrupulous places doing things like that, but is it really worth there while?

It is definitely worth their while, if they are tuning cars whose owners don't know any better. People will look at the dyno readout and think the tuning shop is better than the competition, just because their dyno readout is better.

Think about it - all other things being equal, which are you more likely to go back to? The one that says your car puts out 200rwkw or the one that says it puts out 230rwkw?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pressure when IDLING, is meant to be 51PSi... So that amperage value needs to go up a fair chunk... I'd personally be factoring for more like 12amp at least on those runs, and at that point you need to hope the already there wiring doesn't drop you a volt or two, as that's a lot of fuel pressure flow drop off from 13.5 to 12V! Taking idle pressure of 51psi, means the pump will be drawing a MINIMUM of 9amps all the time based on your reading of the graph (3bar base, then allowing an extra 0.5bar for boost = roughly 51psi)
    • Hi all,  I am in the market for an R200 longnose diff out of a Z31 300ZX, or S12 RSX, DR30 skyline, or similar, in a 3.9 ratio.  Preferably a late model one with the M12 crownwheel bolts.  The only easy to find advert for one of these was my ad back in 2007 when I sold it on this forum.  I sold the diff as I had sold the car it goes to, but as it turns out, after 18 years I got the car back late last year, so now I'm looking for the diff !  If anyone knows where to find a longnose R200 LSD with the M12 crownwheel bolts, drop me a line at [email protected] - Bonus paid if soomeone comes up with the original diff (stranger things have happened !).  Cheers   Ben D    
    • Hi everyone, I used to post here a bit from 2004-2013, when I owned various Nissans, in particular my S12 RSX gazelle, which was sold in 2007.  As luck would have it, after an 18 year hiatus, the car found its way back to me last year, and over the past 11 months I have had the pleasure of restoring it with my kids.  One thing that I am after in particular is a 3.9 ratio R200 LSD for it.  I actually sold the one out of the car here back in 2007 , and it would be incredible if I could track down who I sold it to, so I can see how they have progressed over the years (and to be honest, to see whether I can get the diff back !).  Anyways, hi all and let me know "where are the R200 Longnose diffs all at these days ?  Cheers Ben D  
    • Arms will be the same as the G35 or 350Z, but as above, there was a change in the lower control arm where it connects to the ball joint.  That said, you can remove the ball joint cone from your old ball joints and fit them to the new ball joints.  To be honest, I didn't think the ball joints themselves were different. The main ball joint is a bit awkward to replace, you really need to remove the steering knuckle to press out the old one.  Some people have used tools to remove it in place, but it just seemed too hard to get to. If you are going to press out/in that ball joint, then you may as well just replace the bushings in the LCA and the compression rod.  You can buy the compression rod bushing from Nissan, but the LCA bushes, you will need to go aftermarket. Much cheaper than buying the whole arm.
    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
×
×
  • Create New...