Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry if im commandeering the thread

i have been reading around and getting some mixed views on this topic, what id like to know is, what is the raw output of a stock knock sensor, and what is the ecu looking for after the knock sensor is amplified?

so just in regard to the Knock amp/filter, they are bloody expensive, has anyone rigged up one from say...a jaycar kit?

any advice is much appreciated :D

Zurlox

mine is running off a jaycar kit but they are hardly compact.

The ecu is looking for a 0-5v input 0v being no knock and 5v being your engine about to explode with a signal somewhere in the region of 5-9khz.

Sorry if im commandeering the thread

i have been reading around and getting some mixed views on this topic, what id like to know is, what is the raw output of a stock knock sensor, and what is the ecu looking for after the knock sensor is amplified?

so just in regard to the Knock amp/filter, they are bloody expensive, has anyone rigged up one from say...a jaycar kit?

any advice is much appreciated ;)

Zurlox

I looked into this a few months back. The knock sensor is basically a microphone. The amplifier just amplifies this so that it can be detected by the ECU. The problem is that the engine makes noise at all frequencies. We only need to detect the knock which occurs at specific frequencies. The frequency of knock depends on a few things. Bore size was one of them I believe. I found a formula somewhere that calculated the frequency for you.

So the external amplifier needs to amplify to right level and filter out any unwanted noise outside of the knock frequency. There is an IC out there that is designed specifically for this (I can look it up if you want). It is surface mount and not commonly available from shops like Jaycar.

Also, knock only occurs at a certain point in the engine cycle. Therefore, a smart amplifier/ECU will only switch on the knock sensor input at those points in the cycle where knock is expected. I'm not sure if the Vipec does this or not.

After reading all this I was thinking I'd go for the amplifier sold by Vipec/Bob, but then you need to induce pinging in your engine to set the gain correctly, etc. That kinda scares me, so I've stuck with no knock amplifier and trusted by tuner's tuning :D

After reading all this I was thinking I'd go for the amplifier sold by Vipec/Bob, but then you need to induce pinging in your engine to set the gain correctly, etc. That kinda scares me, so I've stuck with no knock amplifier and trusted by tuner's tuning :laugh:

if your smart you can do it in a non detrimental way, obviuosly you dont want to induce knock at full load, full boost and so forth but it is simple enough to do it safely at the right time.

Edited by URAS

Zurloc PM'd me for further details on the knock amp, but I thought I'd reply here for the benefit of everyone else.

The knock amp IC is the TPIC8101 http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tpic8101.pdf

Autospeed article on DIY knock detection

http://autospeed.com/cms/title_DIY-Detonat...48/article.html

According to that article the frequency of knock can be approximated as 900/(3.14*Cyl Radius). I read somewhere else the frequency also depends on cylinder temperature and the location of the knock sensor, so I dunno how accurate that formula would be.

I was trying to find a Subaru site that I read a few months back. It had lots of info including sound recordings etc. Anyway, if you do a Google search you will find a mountain of information.

I wonder how different the knock amp settings will be from one engine to the next. Perhaps it would be good to collate everyone's settings in a database or maybe the Vipec forum. It would be awesome if we could say RB26 = frequency...., gain....

The stock ECU and the power FC must do the amplifying and filtering on board, so I guess engines must be fairly similar.

Zurloc: Keep us posted on how you go :down:

Edited by BoostedBarge
  • 1 month later...

Update:

i got the knock kit from jaycar, but the frequency band is wrong, it detects noise within 4.8Khz to 6.4Khz, which is too low, i am looking for a band of about 6.5Khz to 9Khz, so in order to achieve this i need to change a couple resistors. the one you change are the 2.7K resistor (inbetween the two 5.6K resistors top right of board) and i changed it to a 1.6K resistor to beef up the low pass filter, the other one you change is the 10K resistor (inbetween two 6.8nF caps top middle of board) and i changed it to a 12K resistor.

Now i havnt confirmed these changes but they should be pretty close :ermm:

Right from the horses mouth:

"Changing to the higher frequency range is easily done by changing the capacitor values in the filter.

The 6.8nF capacitors in the high pass filter become 5.6nF and the 3.3nF to 2.2nF and the 12nF to 10nF for the low pass filter."

This has come from the designers of the Jaycar Kit KC5444 to achieve a frequency band of 6-6.5Khz high pass to 8-8.5Khz low pass.

consult this diagram to get a better picture or things - Knock Schematic

Zurlox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...