Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I found this on ebay, Link

IMO, you can add an RB26, and even an Autech kit (which this one doesn't have) but that still doesn't make it an Autech Stagea. its along the same lines as putting an RB26 and a GTR kit on a GTST and passing it off as a GTR, its wrong.

also, i didn't think you could comply a car that has had an engine conversion :D

oh that looks neat. very sleeperish ....

but yeah, chasis modifications for inlet pipe would be a pain to pass over here with the AIR BAGS cumple zone :S

and might of listed it as AUTECH, with that cheap price it catches peoples attention ... got yours right ? now your advertising for him. i think his sneaky plan worked

and might of listed it as AUTECH, with that cheap price it catches peoples attention ... got yours right ? now your advertising for him. i think his sneaky plan worked

not exactly what i was getting at but you have a point. lol

but yeah, chasis modifications for inlet pipe would be a pain to pass over here with the AIR BAGS cumple zone :S

I am pretty sure Autech stagea starts off as a standard RS4 Rb25det and gets replaced by a rb26 in the autech factory.

Need someone to check their genuine autech and have a look at the engine plate tag. I think it is still listed as a RB25det

I have only ever looked at one genuine autech engine bay and it had a hole hacked thru the chassis for the intercooler pipe.

Did not look very "factory"

I might be wrong.

AFAIK, they start off as a standard shell, but have structural changes made before assembly. I seem to recall seeing something on an Autech brochure showing extra reinforcing around the C pillar, not to mention bolt-on braces under the floor. The marketing hype has had the desired effect here, that's for sure.

My Autech had no extra bracing around the "C" pillar, i was under the impression there was something there to but nothing. All the bracing under the floor bolts striaght up to a standard RS4.

The holes for the intercooler piping on mine had been done with a hole saw and a drill, nothing to rough about it. We just did the same with the swap. There was alot of mods to the panel under the rad support that i could see, little trimming and enlarging of holes, also the ends of the chassis rail are trimmed back for the blow off valve return pipe.

None of it looked "aftermarket" was all done like factory.

And yes all autech's are plated as a RB25.

post-11869-1239925656_thumb.jpg

Edited by msports180
My Autech had no extra bracing around the "C" pillar, i was under the impression there was something there to but nothing. All the bracing under the floor bolts striaght up to a standard RS4.

The holes for the intercooler piping on mine had been done with a hole saw and a drill, nothing to rough about it. We just did the same with the swap. There was alot of mods to the panel under the rad support that i could see, little trimming and enlarging of holes, also the ends of the chassis rail are trimmed back for the blow off valve return pipe.

None of it looked "aftermarket" was all done like factory.

And yes all autech's are plated as a RB25.

So when you run your Autech Vin number thru Fast, does it call up a Rb26 or Rb25?

Also it makes me laugh everyone is concerned about cutting a hole thru the inner guard for aftermarket FMIC when a ADR approved and complianced autech is done the same way, ie an after thought. Where as a factory built and design GTR has a reinforced extra peice of metal around the hole.

When you fast the autech vin its comes up with a little thing saying its an autech listed vehicle (this allways confuses the nissan parts person) and yeah lists RB26.

The autech's are the same as GTR's to where it goes thru the guard in the way that the piping dosnt just pass thru, there is a part that actually bolts in place, a hard pipe, so this will add some strength to that area.

I am pretty sure Autech stagea starts off as a standard RS4 Rb25det and gets replaced by a rb26 in the autech factory.

Need someone to check their genuine autech and have a look at the engine plate tag. I think it is still listed as a RB25det

I have only ever looked at one genuine autech engine bay and it had a hole hacked thru the chassis for the intercooler pipe.

Did not look very "factory"

I might be wrong.

check out the engine plate on this autech for sale. . . . i was reading OPTION mag once and said that some have KAI written on the plate some where , but forgot there reason for during so, somthing to do with modifications ....

post-a203794-DSC00204.JPG

Geez, I'd even be nervous with a legitimate one if I was pulled up by the boys in blue and they challenged the build plate-vs-fitment...

I've always wondered 'how' some of the modified cars get through - you know, high mount T88's etc...

what makes you say that Hugh?

Well it appears to have black face dials and I am under the impression S2 have white face. Correct???

Also there does not appear to be a pic of the rear end. And I wonder why??????

Looks sus, sounds sus and FEELS sus.

Also, I cant see too clearly but does it have RB26 on the timing belt cover????

Edited by 66yostagea
I am pretty sure Autech stagea starts off as a standard RS4 Rb25det and gets replaced by a rb26 in the autech factory.

Need someone to check their genuine autech and have a look at the engine plate tag. I think it is still listed as a RB25det

this is correct... my autechs plate had it listed as an RB25DET.

Autech is not nissan - they purchase the vehicles before making the modifications, including paint. This is why the only way you could get a Series one in manual, or in black, was to buy an autech.

Technically all autechs are Nissan Stageas with a lot of 'genuine aftermarket' parts. Intercooler piping hole on mine was definitely a factory cut job.

Series 2 autechs have white faced dials, series ones have black, and even have the window in the centre for the automatic gear indicator.

He's not trying to pass it off as an autech... 'this one has been fitted with the RB26DETT AS PER THE AUTECH...'

He's just got autech in the topic title to get hits from people who are looking for autechs.

Obviously the car is not one...

Well it appears to have black face dials and I am under the impression S2 have white face. Correct???

Also there does not appear to be a pic of the rear end. And I wonder why??????

Looks sus, sounds sus and FEELS sus.

Also, I cant see too clearly but does it have RB26 on the timing belt cover????

to me it look like it has white faced dials, also the seats are series 2 seats. i know you could change them but why bother. i don't doubt its a series two. i think whoever picks it up is getting a good deal, cheap RB26 manual converted stagea. the only thing that would bother me is as some have said, and thats what trouble you may get into with the transport department, will it need to be mod plated anyway?

Well it appears to have black face dials and I am under the impression S2 have white face. Correct???

Also, I cant see too clearly but does it have RB26 on the timing belt cover????

My S2 doesn't have white dials, but its a 25t X four, not an RS four

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...