Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, just one quick noobie question, when i replace my stock R34 air box wit an Apexi pod, there was this black straw like tube connected to the top half of the air box sorta like a black rubber tube (very thin, about 70mm thin). Does any one know what it is or where should i put it? Cos the there is no other holes on the pod to stick this....lol

And another thing, will the new pod drasticlly affect the amound of air that is being inducted into the engine?

Thanks for the help..

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268418-apexi-power-induction/
Share on other sites

That tube is a vacuum line. I've been told by people that have done this that it's not important and to tuck it away... though I'm really not certain as to what the particular function of that vacuum line is.

More than anything, a pod will make a difference to the induction sound.

Whilst the pod filter looks good, sounds good and can take in a lot of air quite freely; it will also soak up all the engine bay heat a lot more than an airbox with a panel filter, unless of course you enclose it and run a CAI (Cold Air Intake). A CAI could just be a tube running cold air from say the front bar into the air box

To be honest, you'll be better off just replacing the panel filter with say a K&N High Flow filter as you've got a cold air feed from the opening under the bonnet that feeds into the box, and an N/A can only take in so much air anyways... as opposed to forced induction where the filter becomes even more of a restriction. The first step in unlocking N/A power is relieving all the restrictions in the air flow in and out of the engine, and as far as a filter goes, the K&N Panel will do the job just fine.

I've read about some people's experience with pod filters creating more power in the top end in freeway driving, this is mainly due to the ram effect of the cold air hitting the filter, but that's really the only way that you'll get the most out of a pod filter vs the panel filter.

thanks for the very informative reply, u seem to kno the little details to the Skyline...:D

just another thing regarding the heat issue, do u think it ll damage the engine if it is left like dat? im plannin on gettin a carbon fibre heat shield if this is goin to cause too much drama....

Cheers

No worries :P

If you get a pod like I said just shield it or you'll end up with worse performance for your day to day driving.

An N/A isn't going to see anywhere near the temperatures of a turbocharged Skyline, and a lot of those run unshielded. Colder air = more power; hot air = heatsoak and loss of power as the air intake is taking in cold air. Making up an air box with a cold air feed into it is the best way to get performance with a pod filter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...