Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys ..

hks online and tomei online have 2 different part number listings for rb26dett dump pipes ... apparently 1 is to suite the r32 and r33 which has only 1 hole on each dump pipe for the sensors .. however there is apparently another 1 which is to suite r34 which is supposedly different ... having 2 holes on each dump pipe .. so 4 holes all up for 4 sensors?

Does this sound rite to you guys? That the r34 gtr dump pipes are different and have 2 extra sensor holes over the r32 and r33 gtr dump pipes?

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/270092-bnr34-dump-pipe-difference/
Share on other sites

4 sensors doesnt make sense to me ... because 1 would be oxygen and the other would be exhaust temperature .. but what about the extra 2 holes left over? what are they for?

As troy said - each dump has a O2 attached.

GTR's have TWO. They are also R34 specific... R33 and R32 all have different O2 sensor's.

How much power etc are you looking at?

R34 GTR dumps have run 380rwkw without a problem many times... IMO you dont really need to upgrade and can spend the cash on other parts for more benefit :(

As troy said - each dump has a O2 attached.

GTR's have TWO. They are also R34 specific... R33 and R32 all have different O2 sensor's.

How much power etc are you looking at?

R34 GTR dumps have run 380rwkw without a problem many times... IMO you dont really need to upgrade and can spend the cash on other parts for more benefit :P

So it is correct that r34 gtr's have 4 sensors? 2 for oxygen and 2 for exhaust temp mfd?

How much power etc are you looking at?

R34 GTR dumps have run 380rwkw without a problem many times... IMO you dont really need to upgrade and can spend the cash on other parts for more benefit :P

Was just about to say this! R34 GTR Dumps are great! Im making 300kw on mine with no dramas, i plan to keep them for a while!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...