Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

apparently lag freee... its a t67 25g.. meant to be perfect match for sr.. sharp ramp of boost at 3500, it made 288rwkw on 1.5bar with 98oct fuel, power fc, blitz injectors (850cc for those interested) 300zx meter, 1.4mm head gasket (this is where a rb20 is good.. low comp.. higher boost!!! IMO) step 3 cams from hks and a tomie solid lifter kit, hks cooler. cool hand luke has a hks t300 and his car makes 300rwkw with boost at about 3500.. seems REALLY strong and cant really notice lag.. although this is sr crap. im sure it wouldnt be too far from a rb20.. alreading having low comp - more boost.

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi rbs13, I alweays work out the average power from 3,000 rpm below the cars max rpm. For example,

At 7,000 rpm it has 300 rwkw

At 6,000 rpm it has 250 rwkw

At 5,000 rpm it has 195 rwkw

At 4,000 rpm it has 93 rwkw

That's an average of 210 rwkw.

Compare it to this car;

At 7,000 rpm it has 260 rwkw

At 6,000 rpm it has 240 rwkw

At 5,000 rpm it has 200 rwkw

At 4,000 rpm it has 170 rwkw

That's an average of 220 rwkw.

Which car do you reckon is faster?

i know that, but it also depends how you drive, what you want the car for.. the guy who started this thread should of said i wanna use it for drags.. now then i would of said your better off with a smaller turbo so your on boost longer and therefore quicker or going a bigger motor. but he's just said i want 400rwhp witha rb20.. what turbo should i use. im not EXACTLY sure what turbo he should use im just saying a t67 should work alright.. maybe try going gt30.. ???

Sorry maybe I didn't explain it very well, let me have another go.........

You rev car to 7,000 rpm on 1st gear (making 300 rwkw)

You then change into 2nd gear

RPM drops to 4,000 rpm (making 93 rwkw)

You then accelerate through 5,000 rpm (195 rwkw)

Then through 6,000 rpm (250 rwkw)

Onto 7,000 rpm (making 300 rwkw)

You then change into 3rd gear

and the process goes again.

Meanwhile the other car had;

170 rwkw (when you were at 93). That's a 77 rwkw advantage

200 rwkw (when you were at 195). That's a 5 rwkw advantage

240 rwkw (when you were at 250). That's a 5 rwkw disadvantage

260 rwkw (when you were at 300). That's a 40 rwkw disadvantage

Add it up, 77+ 5 - 5- 40 = 37 rwkw advantage to him.

Multiply that for 2nd gear, 3rd gear, 4th gear, that's a 111 rwkw advantage to him. How much you gunna loose by?

I know the article your referring to and im guessing the statement amost lag free is referring to the actual definition of lag, not the meaning commonly used on this forum.

My car is just hitting 8psi at 60km/h in 2nd. Anyhigher rpm and slow corners like turn 2,9 at EC and final turn at Wakefiled will become an issue.

I have been in an S13 with SR20 ad a TD06-20g setup and it wasnt making boost at hose revs, then again it didn thave the head/valvetrain work that T67 SR has.

i think the cam gears bring lag times down a bit.. but then again whats lag.. time it takes turbo to start making boost or time it takes from 0psi.. to what ever boost you wanna run? etc..

sydney kid, i have a rb20 silvia. has some stupid diff gears.. 3800, 110 in fth.. or 3500 at 100 in 5th.. lets say i get all the suppport systems, fuel, ecu, fmic etc.. then put a hks 3037 on it.. would a car with the EXACT same mods but a 2835 or similar but with less lag therefore lower power.. beat me weather it be on a highway or drag strip or in roys case... track?

lol...not a good idea encouraging me, im enough of a liability trying to keep the thing off the walls without trying to punt the car sideways.

It comes down to so many factors, especially when considering the power levels your looking at in a car as light as yours...suspension, tyres, diff, A/R of turbos your looking at.

Hi rbs13, your 110 kph @ 3800 rpm = 28 kph per 1,000 rpm, that's pretty normal Silvia gearing.

The diff ratio is irrelevant anyway, change the diff ratio and you don't change the rpm drop on upchanges. You have to change the gearbox ratios to affect that.

As for the 3037 versus 2835 comparison. Whatever car has the highest average power will accelerate faster thought the gears. The single maximum power at one rpm point is irrelevant.

That's why, for example, a drag GTR with a pair of 3037's will need a close ratio gearbox to use the narrow power band of that size of turbo. Lessen the amount of rpm drop so increases the average power. That's why a car with a close ratio gearbox will be faster than the exactly the same car (and engine) with a standard ratio gearbox.

Hope that explains further

none of my friends sit that high in their cars at all most sit at in their s13s with std diff, etc 3200.. so im guessing i have 4.3's? so would that give me a top speed of round 230-240kph? just that one of my friends has a 200sx.. max power is 327rwkw at 1.35 bar.. im not sure what turbo it is.. but its big! also that power is at 7400.. the car is damn laggy.. even appears so on the highway racing other cars (dont condone just using example) say i come up to him and drop to 3rd.. making me sit at eg.. 5000.. he mite be sitting a bit lower in 3rd. cause i have different ratio's. at 5000rpm with what ever turbo i choose to use i would be WAY better off than him i would think therefore probably beating him for a while.. but i still think he has the power to catch up and possible pass me.. is it true 1 second on the strip = 1 car length.. meaning he would have to run 12's to catch up to my 13 second car if i got a lead of 1 car length or he was at my rear wheel.. or so. lets say he has a 3040 starts boosting 4000.. max boost 5200-5500.. and i have a 3020 (example) thats starts boosting 3500 but has full boost by 4600-4800 both running 1.5 bar.. we both gun it... would he have enough power to beat me if his car has a max of 340rwkw at 7500 and mine is 290rwkw at 8000k

sorry if its a jumbled up post just have a couple of questions regarding this...

Sorry rbs13 I can't answer that question, not enough data. The only way to do is to map out the power from a dyno chart at the rpm's you are talking about.

As for time and speed, 160 kph (100 mph) at the end of the 1/4, is 44 metres per second. A Silvia is (conveniently) around 4.4 metres long, so 1/10th = 1 car length.

Hope that answers that question

Meanwhile the other car had;

170 rwkw (when you were at 93). That's a 77 rwkw advantage

200 rwkw (when you were at 195). That's a 5 rwkw advantage

240 rwkw (when you were at 250). That's a 5 rwkw disadvantage

260 rwkw (when you were at 300). That's a 40 rwkw disadvantage

what turbo would do that(170-200-240-260) if it is at all possible on a rb20?

fmic, exhaust, ecu, injectors, pump, fuel reg, possibly cams, possibly porting, ebc will be done.. turbo is only thing undecided..not limited to internal gate either.. bottom end will remain untouched.. as it is only a rb20.. if i wanted BIG numbers i think a rb26 would be slotted in.. or would it just be easier to slot in a rb26 in the first place? exhuast, boost up would have the rb26 pushing a silvia pretty hard.. but would it be worth the expence for just a silvia.. probably not

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...