Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

ive performed a search & couldnt find my answer but did notice that 'MintR33' has an rb30 in his r33gtst as below:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Re...40&start=40

as some would know ive dropped an rb26/30 in my r32gtr which is just about ready to go & my registration renewal date is due later this year...i need to know what is required in order for my larger capacity engine to be legal for NSW?

i.e. do i need an engineers cert & if so who is recommended in NSW (i live in sydney).

regards

marko

I got an engineers certificate a blue slip, and filled out a change of records form. I didnt have to provide any emissions reports etc as others have said, but the engineer did want to see that all the factory emissions gear was connected. I also showed him the sizes of the brakes which other vehicles fitted with the RB30 come with from factory (R31 skyline etc). The R33 has bigger brakes than those so it wasnt an issue, I found it to be a very smooth excersize.

sounds like your engineer didn't realise what was infront of him. you can pull the wool over peoples eyes and have them believe its a RB30et because they don't always realise the difference. i was told by the authorities here when i asked about the hybrid engine RB30DET and they said it's not possible to register as it was never made from the factory and there is zero information on it "torque, emissions etc etc"

but if you can get it registered with an RB30et then they will most likely never make the connection.

INFACT the first thing he said when i said hybrid engine was "what ? an rb30 that runs of hydrogen and petrol or?" :thumbsup:

No I didnt pull any wool over his eyes. He was told exactly what it was, and the answer I got was aslong as the RB25DET emissions gear was connected it would be ok. It was basically treated as a stroked RB25 rather trying to re-invent the wheel and pass it as a RB30DET, which doesnt exist in the eyes of the RTA

you were lucky, not so here. engine number is quite obviously Rb30 and they don't allow it. They even cracked down on RB30-et conversions. before they never new the difference in number coding, now they do and now it must be a RB30et genuine block.

not that i care. same outcome for me, just lest costing for legalities :thumbsup:

When you buy a new block from Nissan it doesn't have an engine number. The idea is that if you bought a new block then you must be rebuilding your current engine, so you simply transfer the engine number from the "old" block to the "new" block. My "new" block is just a little bit taller than my old "block".

Cheers

Gary

When you buy a new block from Nissan it doesn't have an engine number. The idea is that if you bought a new block then you must be rebuilding your current engine, so you simply transfer the engine number from the "old" block to the "new" block. My "new" block is just a little bit taller than my old "block".

Cheers

Gary

Ye but usually you have to provide a destruction certificate for the old block to re-stamp the new one.

Its highly illegal to just re-stamp.

Also later down the track, if you happen to sell it or something... someone dob's you in... you're in the deep shit.

Just follow the other thread, Guilt-T posted the info, mirror it and be on your way as its all been answered before

Ye but usually you have to provide a destruction certificate for the old block to re-stamp the new one.

Is that a Victoria only rule? I have never heard of a destruction certificate for a block, we have similar for whole written off cars, but not blocks. Chassis numbers are on the write off register, not engine numbers.

Just in case I do have picture of an RB block with a big hole in the side, it's an RB26 out of one of the old race cars, but you can't tell from the picture, it's just an RB could be any one. The engineers seem to like that evidence.

Its highly illegal to just re-stamp.

Yes it is. But stamping a "new" block isn't illegal, it's done every day. My local Mitsubishi dealer did one last week when they replaced a faulty block in my neighbour's Pajero. He was scared about resale value until I showed him the same engine number on the new block.

Also later down the track, if you happen to sell it or something... someone dob's you in... you're in the deep shit.

Depends on who you tell and the old "I bought it like that" for used cars is hard to disprove.

Just follow the other thread, Guilt-T posted the info, mirror it and be on your way as its all been answered before

There is no doubt that it is better to do it properly, I would always advocate that, but sometimes it's just not possible. Especially when using an earlier numbered block, they can get very touchy about it and you can't undo what you have already done with Government Departments. Sometimes you have no choice but to play the game, like everyone else.

Cheers

Gary

Maybe its a Vic law - or something - but im certain you cant just go around restamping blocks because you feel like it... imagine the trouble it would cause and the amount of dodgy shit that would go on.

To a Gov't department a block number is just that, a number. They don't know what model of car its from.

marko - there was a legalities thread in this very section - its probably on page 2.

I know in SA you must have your block stamped by the ****** at regency. but then if you happen to have access to the correct style stamps then it is up to you.

but really i wouldn't care anyway. my car on the papers has RB20 and it has an RB30. Not like the cops will or even know where to check for engine numbers. if you were to restamp id be worried about the cast 'RB30' on the side of the block too. so just leave it i think and forget about it.

currently my only option if i got defected is to swap the engines back over. which id rather do than return things to stock.

Edited by GT-RZ
Maybe its a Vic law - or something - but im certain you cant just go around restamping blocks because you feel like it... imagine the trouble it would cause and the amount of dodgy shit that would go on.

It's certainly different from State to State, the rules are different not to mention the interpretations, especially the Nazis from SA. They don't even follow the ADR's and they're National, supposedly anyway.

New blocks get stamped with old engine numbers everyday, it's not at all unusual.

To a Gov't department a block number is just that, a number. They don't know what model of car its from.

Unfortunately another one of those State differences, in NSW you can't simple stick a 1986 model engine into, say, a 1993 model car. They know the date of manufacture from the engine number, much easier for Commodore RB30's as they weren't available after 1989. No chance of sneaking one of those into a 1993 model. Even if all you are changing is the block, that's where the engine number is and so it is still a problem.

Sure it's always better to get the car engineered, but sometimes it simply not possible by the letter of the law. Plus some guys change their car so often that they would spend half their time and half their money with the engineer. Legally we should get our cars re-engineered everytime we tune them, how many people do that? On that subject, I know E85 has the engineers around here flumoxed, you can now take an engine that previously had no chance of passing EPA requirements, tune it on E85, use a simple cat and it passes easily. Makes a mockery of the "old" engine in "new" car rule, not that it had much credence anyway.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...