Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just been back from the EPA, and with the boost almost stock it still turned out 92db instead of the approved 90db. He would not pass it and i don't consider my car loud.

So i need to take 2db off it, so whats my best options??

I might replace the 3 inch cat with the standard 2.5 inch cat and try and turn the boost down even further, would this do it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/
Share on other sites

dang.. if its nearly at stock boost levels there probably isn't much else you can do to reduce it further by playing with the boost. You could try and make it spool up very late, so its making maximum boost later on, and hence less noise down low.

Did you put the standard box back on? if anything you want to restrict the airflow the best you can, generally the opposite you'd usually want to do.

Stock cat should be a bit quieter, but might not get you under. I passed with full 3" hi-flow cat, but i think mine was a bit of a freak passing with absolutely no exhaust modifications.

Do you have a resonator in there? (its like a bulge you might see in the pipe). Bends in the pipework i think also tend to reduce the noise a bit.

Otherwise its time to borrow a stock exhaust off somebody.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-583572
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Robo's

Just been back from the EPA, and with the boost almost stock it still turned out 92db instead of the approved 90db. He would not pass it and i don't consider my car loud.

So i need to take 2db off it, so whats my best options??

I might replace the 3 inch cat with the standard 2.5 inch cat and try and turn the boost down even further, would this do it?

THat's farcked!!! Go and ask them how do you know your machine is not farked!!!

ask them to test on other machine...

2db come on that;s nothing compare to harley davison Bikes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-584431
Share on other sites

This story sounds familiar.

I got done for 2dB over the limit nearly 18 months ago now. I fixed it by adding another resonator under the car. Originally I had a hotdog style resonator and barrel type s/s muffler at the back of my 3" system and recorded 92dB. Had another box type resonator installed inline with the hotdog and it brought the reading down to 89dB, just enough to get the EPA off my back.

As long as you use straight through type mufflers and resonators you shouldn't loose too much power, but honestly, I wish I had just borrowed a standard exhaust for the test. It would have saved cutting up a perfectly good exhaust.

Z.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-585786
Share on other sites

OK, if you go the steel wool, good luck. I tried this on rumour and all I managed to do was shoot flaming pieces of steel wool out of the exhaust - was pretty funny actually.

If you have the standard Jap type muffler - sounds like you have an N1 type or similar, most will have a small hole right near the tip at the bottom. This is so you can attach a muffler to the exhaust 'for street use', as a loud exhaust should only be used on the track:)

Autobahn sell the muffler inserts.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-586446
Share on other sites

CrazyGTR is spot on, get a piece of thin sheetmetal and put a single smallish hole in the middle, maybe 15mm diameter and put this between the cat and the pipe flange.

If you are clever, it will not be seen, especially if you spray it with black muffler paint around the bright cut edge, before you fit it .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-586979
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
    • Thanks @jtha7 I will have a look around tomorrow but it is a prick of a spot. These are some photos i tried taking 
    • I take it that the knock retard is from bearings tapping a little tune? Thicker oil is a fragile bandaid. You need a much bigger oil cooler and probably the bigger pump being discussed.
    • Hi @Chupapy i had several leaks from coolant pipes being corroded, i also had one leak on back of the head onto transmission. For me that leak was from the turbo water line. Follow the line to the back of the head The hose and metal pipe had perished these are the best pics I took of it at the time
×
×
  • Create New...