Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I just attended my first SAU Deca skidpan day, and to put it simply: I had the most fun I've ever had in a car. For the record, I drive an NA manual Supra.

I've recently purchased HPC extractors, HPC, etc to extra power, but I now realise I've been going about it all wrong!

I've been doing reading on this board but it's all confusing me. I don't know where to start. I want to cut my times, get around the cones quicker, become a better driver and try and stick it to those turbo boys! I'm guessing most important of all are tires, but my current ones still have a lot of tread left and I don't want to replace them quite yet.

So what next, suspension, and what part? I was reading some of the stickies and there are so many parts, pieces and aspects to take into account. Are coilovers the most important part? This car is a daily driver, so if I got coilovers I'd want them to be damper adjustable, and I've read that you do not want to go cheap on them.

Is there anything I should be aware of or taking into account because I drive a Supra. They're rather front heavy (I think) and probably prone to understeer (I read that in a sticky :thumbsup: ).

I don't know really what I'm trying to say. I'm looking for help and advice, even if it is just a link to newbie suspension 101 thread. I've never really looked heavily into the aspect of my car and am unsure where to start.

Appreciate any input, cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/283825-where-to-start/
Share on other sites

Cheapest fix - add some air to the front tyres - at least 2psi higher than the rears. That will reduce the tendency for understeer. Maybe add air to the rears as well, but always have higher pressure in the fronts.

Then, fit a heavy duty rear sway bar. That will further reduce the understeer.

Then heavyduty springs all round.

IMO, you don't need "coilovers", just a simple upgraded shock - KYB, Tokico, Bilstein. "Coilovers" are generally fully height adjustable, and are usually installed so that the weight can be distributed evenly across the suspension. If not set up correctly your car will probably handle even worse than it does now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/283825-where-to-start/#findComment-4773428
Share on other sites

No offense but if you want something fast through the cones you should get something lightweight and with a short wheelbase. The Supra isn't the best car for it (neither are Skylines).

That said, depending on how narrow the cone distances are NA is probably quicker than turbo. With no lag and immediate response its easier to control the car, and too much power is actually a downside.

Pull out as much weight as you can. A reduction in weight helps acceleration, braking and turning.

Bang for buck after doing your tyre pressures you can't go past sway bars. They'll have the car cornering flatter while not making the car too much worse over bumps.

Get them adjustable. Run them in a neutral to understeery setup for safety on the street, and stiffen the rear up when you're on the skidpan. It doesn't matter as much if you spin out, and this way you can get it to turn in.

At first you could even try just disconnecting your front swaybar. With no swaybar effect in the front it'll make the rear relatively stiffer, and help the tail come around. You might find the front rolls a bit too much afterwards, but if the balance of the car is better then you'll know a stiffer rear swaybar is the way to go.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/283825-where-to-start/#findComment-4773483
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...