Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They can be road legal if done properly and it depends on the rules in your particular state. By far the best option is to speak with your local registration authority who should put you onto an engineering signatory. The signatory should know all the ins and outs.

In a nutshell in NSW there are rules for head clearance, visibility and access and all bars above shoulder height must be padded.

If you are planning on racing the car, you may also want to check with the relevant authorities to determine what they require because AFAIK a cage that is road legal is not necessarily approved by say CAMS.

My personal opinion (please note this is an OPINION only) for road going cars is that cages are unnecessary but racing is another matter.

Also, if its a bolt in jap cage it is highly unlikely it is approved for racing in Aus either, they need to be either developed or approved locally and jp use a smaller diameter pipe.

Unless you've got a great reason to keep it....out it goes :cool:

Dean, I would love to have one.

SKYL9, I have seen them from around $350 to $750+ second hand - you get what you pay for.

SIR33, just like installing decent sus, installing a roll cage will increase handling. Roll cages increase chassis rigidity which will provide more positive feedback to the driver.

Basically my thoughts are that for a road only car a cage is a bit of a wank, here's my 2c:

Safety benefits are questionable. The RTA doesnt like cages because they pose a striking hazard in the event of a collision type accident which is way more likely than a roll over. Sounds reasonable to me.

Its an expensive way to chase better handling and a functional cage may require some aspects of the car are compromised (eg headlining, rear seat). Compromising the design of the cage to retain car functionality sort of negates the argument that you need a cage in the first place. Also RTA rules can make it difficult to install a proper cage (ie cant have side bars across doors and driver vision/movement not to be impaired).

So the only real reason I can see for the putting a cage in a road car is because you have lots of money and want to look like an uber cool race car driver.

Of course now someone will come on here and say they got an awesome cage for $10 that retains full functionality of everything in the car, increases stiffness by 1000% and its 100% legal :P

$10, are you kidding, my mates mates mates mate got one for $1.50:p

And browny, I have already spent over 30k on my car, and I consider a $500 roll cage quite a cheap mod, but yeah, if you want a daily driver with back seats and all the rest, a roll cage just wont cut it.

Originally posted by browny

Basically my thoughts are that for a road only car a cage is a bit of a wank, here's my 2c:

Safety benefits are questionable. The RTA doesnt like cages because they pose a striking hazard in the event of a collision type accident which is way more likely than a roll over. Sounds reasonable to me.

Its an expensive way to chase better handling and a functional cage may require some aspects of the car are compromised (eg headlining, rear seat). Compromising the design of the cage to retain car functionality sort of negates the argument that you need a cage in the first place. Also RTA rules can make it difficult to install a proper cage (ie cant have side bars across doors and driver vision/movement not to be impaired).

So the only real reason I can see for the putting a cage in a road car is because you have lots of money and want to look like an uber cool race car driver.

Of course now someone will come on here and say they got an awesome cage for $10 that retains full functionality of everything in the car, increases stiffness by 1000% and its 100% legal :P

Personally, I think it would be worth it, saftey wise, to have a cage in the car. Don't they say driving out on the road is far more dangerous than driving on the race track?? I have seen numerous car fatalities on the news where cars have been stolen, then run through a red light. Who survives?? the thieves....

Sorry, my rant, but if you've ever lost anyone on the road, because of some ignorant *** heads then in my eyes, if you've done everything you can to protect yourself, your better off. NOT just wank factor - a life saver in some cases.....

Did you read why I suggested they may not be great for safety on the roads?

The view by the RTA is that a roll cage is designed to protect the occupants in the event of a roll-over (rare). Because of all the bars and crap that you get with a roll cage it means there is more stuff that you can bust yourself up on in a collision type accident which is vastly more common. Hence in the majority of cases a cage presents more of a safety risk.

Racing is a different situation as there is much greater chance of a roll-over.

THEN add a roll cage, and you are cooking. Besides, I can guarantee that all those pretty DoLuck bits added together probably cost more than 2 roll cages - nevertheless, EVER bit helps, its all good.

for $500, a excellent condition steel cage or an alloy one in decent condition with cosmetic problems. I have seen full chrome molly in near perfect condition second hand for $750.

Originally posted by Steve

Besides, I can guarantee that all those pretty DoLuck bits added together probably cost more than 2 roll cages - nevertheless, EVER bit helps, its all good.

you're probably right, but you can probably get cheaper if you buy a different brand. Do Luck isn't exactly cheap :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've seen similar actually in my situation. You never know what tables are attempted to be used when the car thinks it's -99C or +200C. The fail state is not usually that extreme but you know what I mean - it was in my case though! This is where being able to read all the sensors is useful cause you see this stuff really quickly.
    • The above is very important. However as long as you keep timing relatively low, it's plausible to make your own knock ears and plausible to learn to tune with a modern ECU that can do wideband O2 correction like a boost controller. I mean if you only have one viable road to even drive the car on, learning to tinker to this level may be worth doing given you can't do much else with the car...?
    • I find the fact that the rear plate has to be bent inwards at the rear not so bad: but the front is just awful: It's like come on. (these are my very old, now retired/turned in plates) TBH it is a lot of money to fix a minor issue, the fact I said "I'll never really spend the money on doing this" is why people ended up buying them as a gift for a 'car guy' who can be hard to shop for.. for car guy things.
    • I just bent the ends of my premo plates. It even went through Regency like that after the engine conversion and the inspector (a great bloke!) just squinted his eyes and said "I didn't see that". Plates, and how they look, are just something that have zero importance to me.
    • Yeah, I would have said the same. It makes me suggest that there are other things wrong, such that the ECU is totally unhappy with the broken sensor. The only other thought here is that maybe it is shorted, which might cause a different issue to the typical "disconnected" sensor.
×
×
  • Create New...