Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Vonny at Dyno Tunz - Browns Plains..

Unit 4 79 Eastern RD,

Browns Plains, QLD 4118

(07) 3800 4940

He's tuned my 34, My Ex's s13 and Lots of other cars and have never heard a bad report..

My ex used to go to Charlies, And Vonny is the only one he'll take his car too

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/287678-tuners/#findComment-4837199
Share on other sites

No experience with Matt but will try him the next time after hearing so much about him. Had mine done a few weeks ago at Autotech (Gavin Wood). Result wasnt quite I'm expecting but I'm still happy with it knowing the problem if probably something else. Either way you cant go very wrong.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/287678-tuners/#findComment-4837207
Share on other sites

Vonny at Dyno Tunz - Browns Plains..

Unit 4 79 Eastern RD,

Browns Plains, QLD 4118

(07) 3800 4940

He's tuned my 34, My Ex's s13 and Lots of other cars and have never heard a bad report..

My ex used to go to Charlies, And Vonny is the only one he'll take his car too

Thanks, sound promising!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/287678-tuners/#findComment-4845144
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

i used to use gt auto for my tuning. but i jumped ships to mercury motorsport, they re tuned my car on same boost and rpm and got 26kw more a 44nm more out of it. its accually made a bit more but they turned out down because im anal on reliability, and so r they.

car returns to idol MUCH better now also.

if ur in brisbane, there is know need to go to the gold coast for a tune..... plenty of work shops in brisbane to do the job.

best of luck, let us know how u go!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/287678-tuners/#findComment-4934607
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...