Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm currently looking at buying or building a desktop PC which is used mainly for games, but also as a bit of a Media Centre...maybe. :)

I saw this on MSY.com.au and though I'd see what you guys think of it and if the price sounds good..

or if you have a better option/suggestion:

AMD x2 Dual Core 240 2.80Ghz

MSY AMD "Gamer 3" DDR3 Package

Asus M4A78T-E DDR3

Genuine AMD Boxed Cooling Fan

AMD 790GX/SB750 Chipset – Support Hybrid CrossFire

4xDDR2, 2xPCI-E, 2xPCI, 1xIDE, Upto 12xUSB, 5xSATA Raid Support, 1xFDD, Upto 2x1394a

Nvidia GF 1GB 9500GT

4GB DDR3 1333 Memory (Intel Approved)

Hitachi 1TB 7200rpm SATA Hard Disk

SHAW Titan G9 Tower Case

23" Asus VH 2232T WS 5ms

Microsoft Wireless 1000 Desktop (Keyboard + Mouse)

High Definition Audio CODEC 6 Channel Sound (Integrated)

10/100/Gigabit Fast Network Card (Integrated)

LG 22x Dual Layer DVD RW

A-Power 5.1 Speakers System

Microsoft Vista Home Basic or XP Home

ANTI-VIRUS-Trail Version, Full Set of User Manuals,

Fully Performance and Burning Testing

1 year Return To Base Parts, 5 Year Labour

This is on sale for $1270

Discuss.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/
Share on other sites

It's not a bad PC

The things I don't like:

SHAW Titan G9 Tower Case - Very cheap quality case and the PSU that is in the box is very flaky at best (people on whirlpool forums will have similar views)

A-Power 5.1 Speakers System - I'm just picky when it comes to speakers. Will definitely lack clarity and the punch (mate brought these as cheapie replacements)...I would spend a little bit more and get better quality (or known brand name) speakers.

Also for a machine running 4GB RAM to only offer Vista Basic or XP Home (guessing it's 32bit) is crap...need 64bit OS to fully utilise the 4GB RAM.

Other than that...it's not a bad machine

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4891856
Share on other sites

Anything SHAW should be avoided like it has super AIDS and the plague and gay-flu.

A-Power are terribad.

Get at least a 9600GT they are only a few dollars more.

P5P43TD 119

E8400 207

DDR3 4GB G.Skill-NT 103

1GB 9800GT 119

RC690 146

Hitachi 1TB 97

Pioneer218 49

MS 1000 Desktop 35

VH232T 219

That'd work, no speakers in there though.

Edited by DivHunter
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4892009
Share on other sites

ok so I should go with this instead?

9600GT instead of the 9500GT (+$50)

Hyundai Z-5100 5.1 instead of the A-Power one? (+$30)

As for XP or Vista...I wanted to upgrade to Windows 7 anyways, ...i think.

oh and I forgot to add Office pack (+$125)

Total is now $1455 excluding Win7 and an upgrade to the PSU (they dont offer any upgrades for the case or PSU so that will have to come seperate to this)...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4892054
Share on other sites

oh didnt know that :)

What would you guys suggest for a sub $1.5k system then?

That's essentially what I listed thought I don't really like any of the 775 motherboards that are left, all the good ones went EOL.

Anything SHAW should be avoided like it has super AIDS and the plague and gay-flu.

A-Power are terribad.

Get at least a 9600GT they are only a few dollars more.

P5P43TD 119

E8400 207

DDR3 4GB G.Skill-NT 103

1GB 9800GT 119

RC690 146

Hitachi 1TB 97

Pioneer218 49

MS 1000 Desktop 35

VH232T 219

That'd work, no speakers in there though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4892094
Share on other sites

P5P43TD 119

E8400 207

DDR3 4GB G.Skill-NT 103

1GB 9800GT 119

RC690 146

Hitachi 1TB 97

Pioneer218 49

MS 1000 Desktop 35

VH232T 219

Based on that, plus Vist with Win7 upgrade($110), plus Office Pack ($99), plus MSY to build it ($70)

As for Speakers I still have some speakers here and Could upgrade further down the track anyways.

I end up at at Total of $1373 which sounds pretty good for a ready to go system right?

or should I save $70 and put it together myself? Do you know if I still get the warranty that way?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4892175
Share on other sites

Based on that, plus Vist with Win7 upgrade($110), plus Office Pack ($99), plus MSY to build it ($70)

As for Speakers I still have some speakers here and Could upgrade further down the track anyways.

I end up at at Total of $1373 which sounds pretty good for a ready to go system right?

or should I save $70 and put it together myself? Do you know if I still get the warranty that way?

Building a PC is the FUN part and save you some coin...

However.... If you are not feeling confident - best let them build it, and if anything does goes wrong with the PC (hardware wise) you will have the "upper hand" in complaints.

End of the day it's up to you :blink:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4892211
Share on other sites

totally agree with the above posts...

at least 9600gt if you want to game with semi decent frames, and stay well clear from case+psu (especially shaw :blink: ) they are way more trouble than the few dollars you'll save.

Also not sure if you've considered it but you might want to think about getting an aftermarket cpu cooler if you are concerned about overclocking/fan noise but its up to you.

If you get a cheap case and/or psu then they will be noisy. Zalman make some decent cpu coolers and are good value.

again with the speakers, logitech is the winna but if its not that important to you then anything will do really.

LOL @ Fully Performance and Burning Testing

also with the build it yourself, youll still be under warranty for any parts that are faulty, but if you happen to damage something while putting it together then you are in trouble...so its up to you. Personally i think there's not much you can do wrong and like iseekool said, building it is the fun/satisfying part.

sorry if i repeated what the others said but that's my 2c...hope that helps and good luck. :ermm:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4892704
Share on other sites

Personally if i was purely gaming, i would go dual core over quad core, there are minimal or no games that would utilise all 4 cores. If you want to multitask however, then that is a different story. i believe multitasking and mainly video processing/encoding is where quad core is being used properly. dual cores like the e8400 you usually have more opportunity for overclocking resulting in a higher clock speed which will help for games. Having 2 more cores just for gaming is pointless imo.

hope that answers your question :)

So would we all still go the e8400 dual core over a quad core is the question??? My e8400 still is fine with games, but does it matter yet if you have a quad or do we still feel that a dual will still cut the mustard for games?
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4894186
Share on other sites

So would we all still go the e8400 dual core over a quad core is the question??? My e8400 still is fine with games, but does it matter yet if you have a quad or do we still feel that a dual will still cut the mustard for games?

You can count on one hand the number of games that fully utilise more than two cores and off the top of my head only one ever did it really well - Supreme Commander.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4894516
Share on other sites

You can count on one hand the number of games that fully utilise more than two cores and off the top of my head only one ever did it really well - Supreme Commander.

Ye exactly - and every other desktop app is still single threaded etc.

It'll be at LEAST 18-24months IMO before we see PC's fully using anything near what the current CPU's offer in terms of performance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4894562
Share on other sites

You can count on one hand the number of games that fully utilise more than two cores and off the top of my head only one ever did it really well - Supreme Commander.

There is another game called Strangle Hold that I found (by accident) that utilized all avaliable cores (task manager was showing all a ~35% utilization on all 4 cores on my Q6600).

If you are deciding between Duo or Quad for gaming, get a Duo & use the $ difference to up the video card IMO.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4895407
Share on other sites

Sweet, will kep the 8400 OC'd at 3.3 ghz for a bit longer then until some more high end games utilise it.

Not really much of a Supreme Commander fan to be honest so no big loss.

makes me wonder then why anyone with gaming in mind would even touch the i7?!

Because it's shiny and new and goes to 4GHz pretty easy. Which would be 4 cores, 8 threads at 4GHz, my E8400/3110 ran at 4GHz watercooled too though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4895542
Share on other sites

amen.

There is another game called Strangle Hold that I found (by accident) that utilized all avaliable cores (task manager was showing all a ~35% utilization on all 4 cores on my Q6600).

If you are deciding between Duo or Quad for gaming, get a Duo & use the $ difference to up the video card IMO.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292857-desktop-pc/#findComment-4895614
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...