Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

It's time for me to go beyond what's realistic for the street so I am advertising the complete engine in my S13. People have shown me plenty of hope but no money when it comes to the crunch.

Many of you already know the car/engine, it was the HPI/Zoom project S13 and doesn't have one cheap part on it.

A more extensive spec sheet will be supplied to the purchaser otherwise Advance Motor Mechanics in Strathfield could happily build you a replica without much change from $25K

Makes 503hp / 376kW at the wheels on E85 @ 25psi with 721ftlb of torque, 336kW @ wheels and 621ftlb of torque on 20psi.

Full boost by 5000rpm

Has gone 10.4 @ 136.52mph on radials in Australia's fastest street S13 2815lb (1280kg) S13 and will go high 9's on slicks.

Engine

HKS Cams and valve springs (lumpy idle)

Ported and polished head

Tomei pistons and rods

Nitrided crank

GReddy manifold

Sard fuel rail

Indy blue 1600cc injectors

6Boost exhaust manifold

HKS GT3037S 1.12 A/R exhaust housing, I also have a 0.73 which comes on @ 4500rpm Trust Type R external wastegate

Trust sump

ARP main and head studs

3" dump pipe

Now with LS1 coil pack conversion with custom Magnecor 9mm leads (don't have a current pic)

Dyno sheets and time slips to prove all of the above tuned to perfection by Adam from Just Engine Management since the day the engine was fired up.

Always had Royal Purple Racing 41 through it + filter changed every 2000km's without fail ($188 for 5 litres)

Engine has done approximately 5,500 kms since it was assembled in July 08 and has NEVER ever missed a beat in any way. EGT's have never exceeded 750 degrees on high boost setting.

It is so efficient the car trapped 120mph at the drags on only 11psi with the 0.73 exhaust housing. It is a perfect circuit, strip or daily setup if you want to lose your licence within a day.

If 1600cc injectors and E85 are too hardcore for you I also have Sard 1000cc injectors. With those in and the smaller circuit style setup and BP 98 pump fuel it went 11.0 @ 131mph and 11.2 @ 134mph on 225 Nitto's, 1.8 60ft time.

Aside from the lumpy idle it drives like a stocker and turns all but seasoned racers into scared, no steering wheel hooks, no drifting, just raw power

.

$15,000 or very near offer. I'd prefer it to go with the Haltech Platinum Sport 1000 and inclusive tunes for peace of mind.

Not for the inexperienced driver whatsoever. It is lethal.

You can contact me on 0430 767845

Thanks,

PJ

314eejb.jpg

2zf5ym8.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/295599-sr20det-complete-streetrace-engine/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...