Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well the first pass i have ever had in the car and it was an experience :happy: it left the line pretty lazy then at the 60 foot mark it turned hard right and nearly put me into the wall

so i got off it and got back on it and went 9.9 @ 147 the car felt very strong so now its off to get a cage and chute and we will try again.

car weighed 1601 with driver and full trim.

A big thanx to cv performance and steve from bms transmissions

now i can put my RH9GTR plates on hahahaha

60 foot was 1.6 i will post up time slip tomorrow

Edited by superjet760
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/295909-first-pass-99-147mph-full-trim/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Very impressive car....

It was amazing to see a car in full trim and at the 60 foot mark break traction...

Then to get off it and still run a 9.9

Wow!!!!

I recorded the pass on my camera but don't know how to upload it.

It shows the car backing off....

Would have at least lost 0.5-1sec

So it shows the has alot more in it...

Congrats Paul...... And well done for making it into the RH9 club....

We havent done any full passes yet but hope to get some done in a couple of weeks time. We only had 1 launch with times which was 1.4 to 60ft which was a bit soft, the next launch was hard lifting the fronts and seemed to be quicker but no times were recorded as he had already deep staged and bought up the red light.

Here is the time slip

I wonder how emasculated the guy in the other lane was?

He would have pulled a healthy lead out the hole, but then you would have blown past him like he wasn't moving by the time you "got around" to actually driving.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...