Jump to content
SAU Community

Calling R32 4 Door Owners

Slow S13

By Slow S13,
in Four Door Family & Wagoneers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Slow S13 Proficient

Slow S13

Posted
Posted

Ok, I came to the conclusion that i need some new wheels with more dish so i thought i would ask you guys what fits under a 4 door without flaring ( and prefer not to roll as i dont want to crack the paint, But will if needed). Something in a 17 X 8/9 i would imagine but some help with offsets would really help.

Thanks for your help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/297119-calling-r32-4-door-owners/
Share on other sites
CeJay Grand Master

CeJay

Posted
Posted

Front 17 x 8 +35

Rear 17 x 9 + 42

front offset looks crap though, but I don't think you can get much more offset than my rears, my rear rims are around 1/2 cm from my hicas rack.

I think the insides of my rears are rolled though, but not flared

Habler Rising Star

Habler

Posted
Posted (edited)

^^^ your doing it wrongggggggggggg^^^^^^^^^^^

Most rims (each rim is different, this is just a gernalisation) the wider and lower the offset you go the more dish it will create. A +45 9 inch rim will usually have next to no dish while a +5 9 inch rim will have a noticable amount. Remember this is just a generalisation as each rim differs - some create taper, some have different disk clearance etc et

PM Nisskid and he will be able to tell you exactly what you need being a 32 4 door owner.

Here is a link to my mates 4 door to give you a rough idea to work off -

http://nissansilvia.com/forums/index.php?s...p;#entry5461524

There is plenty of infomation on here and nissansilvia for 32 4 doors and rims.

Edited by Habler
astrotristan Grand Master

astrotristan

Posted
Posted
Front 17 x 8 +35

Rear 17 x 9 + 42

front offset looks crap though, but I don't think you can get much more offset than my rears, my rear rims are around 1/2 cm from my hicas rack.

I think the insides of my rears are rolled though, but not flared

yep thats a fail.

mate get 17*9 all round with an offset between 24 to 16 depending on how baller you want to go (or how much guard work you want to do)

17*9 + 24 would be nice, and would just stick outside the stock guards ;)

edit - with that said, r33 GTR wheels look sexy on 32s (17*9 +30)

nisskid Grand Master

nisskid

Posted
Posted

racey (URAS NS-01 17x8/9 +30)

00001qb9.jpg

racey (33 GTR wheels)

dscn0042zz4.jpg

newschool dish (Volk GT-P 17x9 +16)

DSCN8977.jpg

old school (17x8.5 +20 and 17x9.5 +38)

dscn0029smalltp6.jpg

old school racing (17x9 +24)

wallpaperuf.jpg

if you want maximum dish with aggressive fitment, something around 10" +22 with 235 stretched onto it, standard camber arms (decent amount of camber), then on the front 9" +15 with 215 stretched on, with a decent amount of camber.

CeJay Grand Master

CeJay

Posted
Posted
yep thats a fail.

mate get 17*9 all round with an offset between 24 to 16 depending on how baller you want to go (or how much guard work you want to do)

17*9 + 24 would be nice, and would just stick outside the stock guards :bunny:

edit - with that said, r33 GTR wheels look sexy on 32s (17*9 +30)

I'll agree my front offset is shithouse, but i don't particular want my rims sticking out of my guards, and the rears have a reasonable amount of dish

marq29.jpg

r32_det Contributor

r32_det

Posted
Posted

nisskid, is that yours in the last pic? looking tuff bro. how'd you go about doing your guards? i'm after a simliar roll/flare on mine. did you just use a bolt on hub guard roller and bog? and also how far can you roll 4dr rear guards withou getting a pressure dent? the swage through the middle should mean you can get a heap more than silvias etc? only limiting factor would be the door

nisskid Grand Master

nisskid

Posted
Posted
nisskid, is that yours in the last pic? looking tuff bro. how'd you go about doing your guards? i'm after a simliar roll/flare on mine. did you just use a bolt on hub guard roller and bog? and also how far can you roll 4dr rear guards withou getting a pressure dent? the swage through the middle should mean you can get a heap more than silvias etc? only limiting factor would be the door

yeh it's what mine looked like about a year ago, looks a bit different now lol

that was just pulling the flare out with some clamps, then bogging. honestly i probably wouldnt recommend doing it again, it really doesnt give u a lot of clearance with the shape of 32 guards. i pulled mine a decent way, but i know of mates who've popped their rear 4dr guards, as i personally havent popped mine myself, not sure how far u can go before it does.

  • 7 months later...
aussietroy Proficient

aussietroy

Posted
Posted

hey guys, im looking at buying some new wheels for my 4 door but its a 4 stud ....

is the offsets different in N/A's due to smaller brakes ??

and what would be perfect size and offset to fill out the guards without modifying the guards at all ??

ive read somewhere that if you get 18's they will clear the brakes and you wont need to worry about offset??

im just really confused so yea

cheers guys

32 4whore Experienced

32 4whore

Posted
Posted

Nope.

But you will find it can handle more dish as the NA 32 4dr's had shit house tiny brakes.

I'd upgrade brakes to the Type M items which are the R33 brakes.

Then if you had enough cash do the 5 stud hub conversion and then the world is your oyster.

I had 17 x 8 +18 on the front and 17 x 9 +24 on my old 4dr.

But as nisskid has stated you can go wider and lower offsets.

  • 2 weeks later...
aussietroy Proficient

aussietroy

Posted
Posted

hey guys,

found some rims i like and that will fit my budget (either koya drift teks or koya rg teks).

will 18x8.5 and 18x9.5 +34 all round fit under a 32 N/a 4 door Without Modification ??

if not will 18x8 and 18x9 +34 fit ??

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...