Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Spot on there Fishy.....Vetel was leading the race and was looking very comfortable in taking the race win till a crack/leak in the exhaust and then he just got swamped.....worst part of this season is 1 engine package is meant to last 3 grand prix this season.......and if you have to change the engine for the australian gp then there is a 5 or 10 spot grid penalty....

Ferrari 1 + 2 :(:O:O:O

How good were both the ferrari drivers.....i thought that alonso drove briliantly and massa followed suit even though massa out qualified alonso lol.....

lol say what? i agree with what he's saying. bring back the clutch :P

whats wrong with the driver wanting it to be more of a battle with drivers as apposed to which team pumps the most $ in

most if not every team this season are working on a budget lol

how did Force India go on the harder compound? Was listening as i fell asleep, the only car in the top 10 to start on Prime.

they would have done well except they spun out/crashed in the first lap.....but did well to come back from the spin on turn 1 to finish the race strongly

  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

most if not every team this season are working on a budget lol

i dont believe ferrari will eva work on a budget, theyll find ways around budgets n rules :(

and you seem a bit harsh on the webber, i dont watch that much but most driver interviews ive seen in f1 they talk like their the friggen greatest driver who ever lived and how rules and their team let them down.

Edited by Inline 6

harsh on webber you have got to be kidding me.....as quoted in the last page of this thread.....he is a loose cannon at times......he is a good driver but i dont know how he finished 8th when his team mate....was leading the race and only gave up the lead due to car problems.....

harsh on webber you have got to be kidding me.....as quoted in the last page of this thread.....he is a loose cannon at times......he is a good driver but i dont know how he finished 8th when his team mate....was leading the race and only gave up the lead due to car problems.....

God i cant stand Webber. Always whinge whinge whinge, its always someone elses fault or the cars fault. And now there is a driver in the other car it shows he is a useless prick as he always has been. Sorry but i dont like the guy he hasnt achieved jack all in my books.

dont leave so soon mate....you should read last season's f1 thread....:thumbsup:

what happened to the USF1 team....they didnt even have the cars on the track i mean wtf??? also virgin cars havnt seen any wind tunnel time at all.....the whole car and concept designed on a computer and thats it lol

harsh on webber you have got to be kidding me.....as quoted in the last page of this thread.....he is a loose cannon at times......he is a good driver but i dont know how he finished 8th when his team mate....was leading the race and only gave up the lead due to car problems.....

+1. And can you believe these moron journalists who were suggesting that Schuey was past it all (because he was out qualified by Rosberg), when in actual fact if you look at the where everyone else finished in comparison to their team mate you'll see that MS was closer than even our hero Webber (despite Vettel's spark plug problem), the reigning WDC Button to their respective team mates. I deliberately didn't mention Massa because this is his first GP since that unfortunate accident.

well the next race is in 2 weeks time....lets see if ferrari can do it again....just like team vodafone in v8 supercars lol....they won both of races of the first 2 rounds.....

in the last 6 or so season's the driver who has won the first gp has gone to win the championship......could it repeat again.......i f**king hope so lol

Im sorry for being harsh on Webber, but as an elite driver or one of the worlds best drivers, you have a lot to input into a cars handling, driveability and handling. So my question is why is a rookie doing better than him? Surely he has had enough time to test make adjustments, to suit his racing style, instead once again i repeat its always someone elses fault.

ummm i dont think vetel is a rookie anymore George.......dont forget that these cars change a lot from round to round let alone from season to season.....and sometimes a driver/engineer can dial the right settings off the bat and have awesome race car where as another driver and his engineers would be struggling to get the settings absolutely right......vetel's car looked a lot quicker then webbers last round even through qaulifying.....the minor teams were 5-8 seconds off the pace of the front runners.....now that is absolutely shocking......makes v8 supercars exciting to watch.....at the clipsal weekend the top 10 were seperated by 0.5 of a second and the top 20 runners were within 1-1.5 seconds of the guy on pole.......now in contrast the top 3 of round one in F1 were seperated by almost 1 second alone....forget about the top 20......

There's no doubt in my mind that Vettel is a class driver and imo he's making Mark look a little bit more ordinary than he might really be... that and the fact that sometimes extra long circuits like the Bahrain one makes bigger gaps between drivers and teams

will be interested to see if vetel messes up qualy if he can actually overtake to make up spots.... as for the ferarri drivers, they have a better car than everyone bar red bull by about .5s/lap corse they were going to do well!!! just a shame it looked like a slow precession rather than a race =\

while were sticking the boot into webber, apparently RBR actually uses vetels car setup for both drivers coz its the faster one of the 2.... go figure! i'd still support an aussie and my interest in a race generally relates to how well he does, but im not blind XD

its the case in most teams fishy......they go through practise and find out who/which one of the 2 drivers is the faster one and copy the same settings across onto the other car.....then go for more practice and then set the car to the driver liking......with the fuel load they have at the start of the race the drivers are doing roughly 8-10 second slower in lap times when compared to what they qualified with......and towards the end of the race the car gets a bit faster as the fuel load wears off....but it leaves the car generally rather high off the ground in ride height so still it wont be as fast.....

you make a good point in regards to if vetel is down in the pack then how would he go about it in the race......i for one thing if vetel is 4th or lower on the first lap then i dont see him winning specially if both ferrari's are up front.....also the driver who is sitting on 1st position gets the benefit of a clean track/cold air use....the drivers 1-1.5 second behind him get a lot of the hot air which cannot be good for the engine :bunny:

with the fuel load they have at the start of the race the drivers are doing roughly 8-10 second slower in lap times when compared to what they qualified with......and towards the end of the race the car gets a bit faster as the fuel load wears off....but it leaves the car generally rather high off the ground in ride height so still it wont be as fast.....

lap times at the end of the race were still 6-7 seconds off qualifying pace!!

and i think qualy was worse as well... because if you want to refule you have to pull into the garage and do it, so lots of teams were only doing 1 lap flyers!

tho i think if overtaking was easier, we'd see people making multiple pit stops and faster lap times =\ its a viscious cycle!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...