Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why we tune on vortex 98 , even country caltex have it

I've been to Caltex's in Perth that don't even have Vortex98.

Pick a fuel , have car tuned on it and stick to it .

That's what I've done, and you bag my opinion of U98? why? because you use Vortex98?

I did an ~1300km round trip down south and could get U98 everywhere until Albany, filled up there and carried an extra 40L in jerry cans.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5175894
Share on other sites

I've been to Caltex's in Perth that don't even have Vortex98.

That's what I've done, and you bag my opinion of U98? why? because you use Vortex98?

I did an ~1300km round trip down south and could get U98 everywhere until Albany, filled up there and carried an extra 40L in jerry cans.

Not bagging bp98 ,Our BP is daylight hours and often runs out as its only place in town with it yet we have two 24hr caltex servos with in 10ks of each other and no BP at collie and if we have cars in perth for events there is 24hr caltex 500mtrs down road from our maddington depot ..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176219
Share on other sites

In my car, every time I put my foot down and it hits full boost.. no pingping = no bad fuel.

LOL then regular is good , 31 ran on regular unleaded at drags after i filled from wrong jerry can :) no ping n still 12s .. also you dont always hear the marbles drop :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176224
Share on other sites

Whether its vortex98, Ultimate98 or Peak98, its essentially same shit different bucket.

Those who claim to have huge fuel efficiency discrepancies are mostly lying to themselves only because the chances that they drove the same places/distances/speed/foot down etc could not have been accurate.

Most street cars 95ron is fine, the RON only matters when the car is of significant horsepower and in which case, they wouldn't be running average joe unleaded fuels anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176256
Share on other sites

LOL then regular is good , 31 ran on regular unleaded at drags after i filled from wrong jerry can :) no ping n still 12s .. also you dont always hear the marbles drop :)

If you can hear it.. it's probably already done some damage!

Fair call that regular is probably fine what with the safe tunes most people get (read: rich) but I would still prefer to run 98 for a little bit of safety headroom!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176273
Share on other sites

Whether its vortex98, Ultimate98 or Peak98, its essentially same shit different bucket.

Those who claim to have huge fuel efficiency discrepancies are mostly lying to themselves only because the chances that they drove the same places/distances/speed/foot down etc could not have been accurate.

Most street cars 95ron is fine, the RON only matters when the car is of significant horsepower and in which case, they wouldn't be running average joe unleaded fuels anyway.

I drive my car to uni, it is the exact same distance, speed limit and place every day of the week. Because it is a 108km round trip, i drive very conservatively, so don't put my foot down very much at all, usually change gears before 3k. Fine there might be the odd occasion where i go over and accelerate a bit harder, but that is not going to make 200kms difference to a tank of fuel. Fact is, my car get's less mileage out of a tank of Peak or Caltex than it does from BP. You can try to tell me otherwise but i am the one that drives my car, i know what it gets to a tank of fuel. They are not all the same fuel.

You realise that in Japan, 98 RON is the lowest octane fuel they have? Therefore a JDM car should not be run on anything less than 98 RON, because it was not made to do so. Your Fords and Holdens and Hyundais etc. will all run fine on normal unleaded because they are made for it. JDM cars can be run on normal unleaded too no doubt about that, but just because it can be done doesn't mean it should. I like to make sure my car is healthy, part of that is making sure it has the right fuel in it.

And there are plenty of cars out there running 900hp or other ridiculously large power figures, and they are doing it on pump fuel. If you car is tuned for it, it is perfect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176382
Share on other sites

I drive my car to uni, it is the exact same distance, speed limit and place every day of the week. Because it is a 108km round trip, i drive very conservatively, so don't put my foot down very much at all, usually change gears before 3k. Fine there might be the odd occasion where i go over and accelerate a bit harder, but that is not going to make 200kms difference to a tank of fuel. Fact is, my car get's less mileage out of a tank of Peak or Caltex than it does from BP. You can try to tell me otherwise but i am the one that drives my car, i know what it gets to a tank of fuel. They are not all the same fuel.

You realise that in Japan, 98 RON is the lowest octane fuel they have? Therefore a JDM car should not be run on anything less than 98 RON, because it was not made to do so. Your Fords and Holdens and Hyundais etc. will all run fine on normal unleaded because they are made for it. JDM cars can be run on normal unleaded too no doubt about that, but just because it can be done doesn't mean it should. I like to make sure my car is healthy, part of that is making sure it has the right fuel in it.

And there are plenty of cars out there running 900hp or other ridiculously large power figures, and they are doing it on pump fuel. If you car is tuned for it, it is perfect.

200kms is a LOT of difference lmao

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176394
Share on other sites

200kms is a LOT of difference lmao

I know that. Which is why i said the few random moments of acceleration are not going to cause such a massive difference between fuel consumptions. I get 500-550kms to a tank of BP Ultimate if i drive casually. I get about 470-500kms from a tank of Vortex 98. And i get about 320-370kms to a tank of Peak 98. For me that shows the quality between the fuels.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176430
Share on other sites

Hanaldo, there are 4 reasons this occurred.

-shit batch of fuel which i doubt

- you didnt fill it up as much as you thought

- you didnt reset the odometer for a while

- you were high at the time.

The difference you stated is huge, I dont get this sort of discrepancy if i have a drift practice during the week. I normally get 450, with a drift practice, read 15-20 laps of barbs on limiter i still get 300-350.

There is NO way in hell you got that sort of difference peak vs bp under normal driving standards.

Not a personal attack, just stating what im sure alot of people are thinking.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176585
Share on other sites

Hanaldo, there are 4 reasons this occurred.

-shit batch of fuel which i doubt

- you didnt fill it up as much as you thought

- you didnt reset the odometer for a while

- you were high at the time.

The difference you stated is huge, I dont get this sort of discrepancy if i have a drift practice during the week. I normally get 450, with a drift practice, read 15-20 laps of barbs on limiter i still get 300-350.

There is NO way in hell you got that sort of difference peak vs bp under normal driving standards.

Not a personal attack, just stating what im sure alot of people are thinking.

As i said before, it's very possible i got a shit batch of fuel, but it's never happened with BP which is why i choose that fuel. You can choose to doubt me if you want, doesn't bug me in the slightest what fuel you use. But having actually compared these fuels for myself, those are the results i got and those are the results i base my opinion on.

No offense taken Greg, i was as baffled as you are and i still don't know how to explain it. That is just what happened and since then i have refused to use Peak

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176640
Share on other sites

Pick a fuel , have car tuned on it and stick to it .

still doesnt save you from bad batches of fuel. i've been using bp98 since i've been doing my own tuning. filled up at bp kalamunda on saturday night and had to pull out 5 degrees of timing everywhere on boost just to stop it pinging badly, was still pinging lighty after that. 5 degrees is a ridculous amount between tanks of the same brand fuel. if it werent so far away i'd be going back and syphoning it back into their tanks

hanaldo, with the standard ecu's in skylines, especially 33s there is no need whatsoever to run anything more than 91. the timing in the standard maps is beyond conservative.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5176745
Share on other sites

Hey guys, there are only 2 fuel stations in my area which is shell and caltex... So I would like to ask what fuel is best for my car (1994 R33 GTS-T)

Note: If I really need to get a lil bit further to get fuel better than caltex and shell... I will... So pls give me some suggestion.. THANKS

EDITED: Do skylines have the same size of fuel tank? From what I've been told skylines have 65 litres of tank isnt it? My friend's only fill up somewhere around 45 litres full tank.

Edited by R33 Gts-T Sedan
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5177395
Share on other sites

EDITED: Do skylines have the same size of fuel tank? From what I've been told skylines have 65 litres of tank isnt it? My friend's only fill up somewhere around 45 litres full tank.

Yeah 65 litre tank for a GTS-T, it's normal to only fill up 45-50 litres when the needle says you're on empty.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5177717
Share on other sites

Wow does that mean even if the needle is pointing on E we still have 10 litres or more left?

I've changed fuel pumps before but I don't really remember if the fuel pick-up sock is going to be able to suck up the last few litres of fuel in the tank.

And I'm going to assume that 65L is the total volume of the tank? And you wouldn't actually fit 65L of fuel in it because of an air pocket at the top or something. I dunno.

Doesn't really matter. Just try and fill up when you're in between 1/4 and Empty.

I get just over 400kms from about 50 litres of fuel, but it's not a stock car.

Edited by SKYRYAN
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5179623
Share on other sites

oh yea never thought of the air pocket... Maybe you're right... I can't really know when is my tank empty because my fuel needle keeps moving up and down.. Don't really know what's the problem... Guess I'll just wait till the orange light comes on...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/313224-fuel-98/page/3/#findComment-5179635
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cheers. Skyline is back on the menu, can’t get rid of it. It’s like a child you don’t want, or herpes 
    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
×
×
  • Create New...