Jump to content
SAU Community

FS: Perfect 91' Exa... MUST LOOK

jazza08
 Share

Recommended Posts

GTRboy Proficient

GTRboy

Posted
Posted

Well basically... Im open to offers.

Im lookin for around 7, (insurance company quoted my cars value, due to cond, age, kms etc at 7,200) But im askin 7 neg.

Its a 1991, currently has 109,000ks, is white, has no noticable scratches etc, but does have small scratches (if u inspect closley). Interior.. is well perfect, i can email you pics to prove what ive just said...

The car has da norm of a 91' (last year in production) edition, i was lead to believe the seats are diff? I know they are nice sort of bucket seats anywayz, p/w, p/m, a/c, p/s, 4 speaker stereo(below), 4 wheel disc brakes.. cant think of nethin imparticular... but the list goes on doesnt it

Ive installed white headlights, white park lights, and a blue neon (under switch, IS LEGAL) on the front end.

I have installed front n rear speakers:

Front: Clarion 6 & 1/2 inch, 200W with Tweeters and Cross overs... Top of the line..

Rear: Clarion 4x6 inch, 100W with built in tweeters

I will have the original deck in, but the system sounds very nice.... clarity is really good thanks to the cross overs. Bit expensive, but was worth it.

Wat else is there to say... original 14' alloy rims, original everything thats not been mentioned. Timing belt, spark plugs, thermostat, brake pads, were all recently changed, engine is running in above expected condition, sounds nice and runs as she sounds, spot on. Serviced every 5,000kms, infact in the last 5000kms its been serviced 3 times as ive changed the things mentioned above...

If you want a nice clean cut exa, then look no further, i have no issues with people wanting to check the engine etc, but i dont want any tyre kickers thanks... dont have the time.

Im not in a rush to sell it, as im looking at buying a 180sx and that is the ONLY reason id be open to offers... if your interested my email address is [email protected] however i come on the forum alot so you can pm me.

I have NO idea on how to post pics... but under my name you can see the white park lights wid da neon... So anywayz, i have plenty of pics, so email me and ill send em across. Plz only serious buyers because as i said, i dont need to sell it...

Thanks

Regards

Jazza

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...