Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as title states, i have a set of SSR Strusse wheels for sale, have freshly powder coated black centres, huge dish and would look insane on a stagea. follow link for pics and contact info

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Sa...ml#entry5153488

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/314533-ssr-strusse-19x10-19-19x11-11/
Share on other sites

huge dish and would look insane on a stagea

would look insane on a stagea.. if they would fit.

you won't get an 11+11 on the rear without a spacer to clear the struts, then you'd need wider guards to cover them

Not to

mention as soon as u drove atessa wd flip out!

why? just make sure you get the right tyre sizes to maintain the same rolling diameter front and back.

why? just make sure you get the right tyre sizes to maintain the same rolling diameter front and back.

yeah people put different size tyres on the front and rear of stageas and awd skylines all the time, sure its not reccomended but its not like they have a locked centre diff. and im pretty sure they will fit, my quick offset maths says they will. but of course if someones interested id reccomend a test fitment first

yeah people put different size tyres on the front and rear of stageas and awd skylines all the time, sure its not reccomended but its not like they have a locked centre diff. and im pretty sure they will fit, my quick offset maths says they will. but of course if someones interested id reccomend a test fitment first

what? no.

you have to maintain the same rolling diameter front and back or your ATESSA. This means the diameter of your wheels plus the tyres in the front have to be the same as the diameter of your wheels plus the tyres in the back. Tyre profiles are measured in percentages of their width, so when you run staggered widths, you have to make sure the profiles are still the same size.

use this to help you choose:

http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

It is doable on a Stag with those wheels.

235/35/19 front and 275/30/19 rear and the rolling heights will be the closest you can get for staggered 19s. from memory, they're only 3mm apart

D.

currently has 245 35 19 and 275 30 19

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...