Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have the new haltech wideband. i checked the tps and the way its made it can only go on one way. its weird, like i said i opened throttle and did set voltage to make it like lets sat 4v at 100% and i closed it and did a set throttle for 0% and it was 0 volts. seems like and voltage adsjustment i make forces it to be seen as 100%

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have the new haltech wideband sensor, the sensor also will only go on one way. its weird. i did a calibration for it yet it still reads 100% throttle. But it reads the voltages in between. like i opened it all the way and clicked set voltage for 100% than i closed it and did the same thing. it gave me 2 dif votleags liek 4.89 and . 38 but when i in put them it still says 100% and i switch them it still says 100% but when i made them both voltage for when its closed it says its closed now but always stays at 0 % now, at least i can get it started from there and trouble shoot it hopefuly

ok i havent messed with tps issue, but car starts up but turns off immediately, gunna try playing with throttle and seeing what i can get it doing. also when it goes, it backfires and pops

* ok something weird i noticed. i did the ignition lock, to set timing, to match that but when i look at degrees on crank pulley and whats displayed at ignition base its completely differant

Edited by stricnynel0s

yes, i did the ignition lock for 15 and adjusted cas till it was at 15, but my friend heard backfire and popping and thinks its still a timing issue, and the tps shows 0 right now without me touching it. where should the ignition base and advance be on the ecu manager or actually what should they reflect, and is it possible my trigger settings are off ?

i am about to get ready and give up, i tried everything literally for hours on end, my old engine management works 100% this dosent work at all, there is no shop close to me with experience with the unit without going 120 miles minumum, and i cannot drive it so i am stuck not only paying for tune but liek 300 for the tow. i sold my maf and my old wideband so i cant even hook up my old ecu to get the car running.... at this point i can literally do nothing....

when you got it to run, and you said it was poping backfiring. was there great clouds of black smoke/fuel coming out the back? did you try adjusting the fuel table to get it to idle? you running the aac valvle? And what base map did you use? the RB26 or the RB25 one?

its a rb26 one, with VE turned on and all values are set to 45% didnt see any smoke, just lots of smoke and i can hear the compression stroke noise, i defintaely thinks its a timing issue, i can make a video and upload it to tonight maybe to show you. it literally turns on and stays on for one second, no amount of throttle or anything will make it stay on, and honestly i gotta open throttle a bit just to get it to do that sometimes. i am running thr aac valve. i didnt think it mattered which base map i used since i wsas doign ve, and i knew rb cas was the same on 20-26 except neo. do you perhaps have a map i could compare it to ? also man i want to thank you man i appreciate the help your giving me i hope we can get it running !!

Edited by stricnynel0s

try bumping the fuel % up and down, I grabbed the 45% off a GTR running a platinum pro with VE. but that's only running 440cc injectors.

Also in the software you can load a diagnostics page, which has all the sensors, and the inj ms. (view menu>load page>diagnostics) but this mich only be on the latest version of the software (1.0.7)

you should probably check your plugs, as if it's been over fuelled, they are probably rooted.

Edited by sav man
i have the new haltech wideband sensor, the sensor also will only go on one way. its weird. i did a calibration for it yet it still reads 100% throttle. But it reads the voltages in between. like i opened it all the way and clicked set voltage for 100% than i closed it and did the same thing. it gave me 2 dif votleags liek 4.89 and . 38 but when i in put them it still says 100% and i switch them it still says 100% but when i made them both voltage for when its closed it says its closed now but always stays at 0 % now, at least i can get it started from there and trouble shoot it hopefuly

I had the power and earth wires switched when I wired the TPS up and consequently the TPS signal was reversed as in your case. Swapped them around without any issue. That said my car ran ok just had a nasty deadspot down low until I fixed it.

It sounds like the timing the computer is seeing and the actual timing are quite different. Might explain why it will run initially with timing locked at 15 degs but then stall once the revs increase.

I had the power and earth wires switched when I wired the TPS up and consequently the TPS signal was reversed as in your case. Swapped them around without any issue. That said my car ran ok just had a nasty deadspot down low until I fixed it.

It sounds like the timing the computer is seeing and the actual timing are quite different. Might explain why it will run initially with timing locked at 15 degs but then stall once the revs increase.

should i just change their pin location than ? there is only 2 wires on a 3 wire plugs used. i havent tried to start it with timing locked at 15, i just did it to set timing, can i try that and lock it at 15 start it ?

yeah i changed the plugs and it did make the world of a differance, but still same symptoms, its just sooo annoying cause only haltech gives me these problems

you tried pull some fuel out of it? Try starting at somthing low like 10% and then try and start it, then keep bumping it up till it states. if changing the plugs made it better, i'd think there is too much fuel.

if your tps is reading 0% the car should still idle

Edited by sav man
you using an external map or the internal one? can you pop your latest map up?

i am using internal map sensor

and here is my latest map, it dosent have the 10 fuel setting but same map

http://www.mediafire.com/?bzrnxzwmemk

i'll have a good look at it when i get home from work, did you try other values apport from 10%

Do you know the model of the injecters, cause i think the lag time will need to be reset in the Haltech, as they will most likely be diferent to the oem 440cc ones.

i'll have a good look at it when i get home from work, did you try other values apport from 10%

Do you know the model of the injecters, cause i think the lag time will need to be reset in the Haltech, as they will most likely be diferent to the oem 440cc ones.

rc eng inj, and that was it honestly. i can try more later i was going to try 5 but i dont wanna go lean and make engine go pop lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...