Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there guys, maybe i'm a bit green at you guy's terminolagie but what does rwkw stand for i've never been to a dyno before is this where this term originates. If the spec's fof a 250GT state 215ps@6400rpm and 27.5KGM@4400 what figures should i expect on the dyno if my ride is bog std.As for my 1/4 mile time i don't know it but in auto ,normal, i only get to around 120km/h and in manual,triptronic,with the power light on i only get to around 130km/h and in both cases absolutely no wheel spin. Maybe i don't know the technique of getting off the line, cheers

RWKW = Rear Wheel Kilowatts

The figure of 215ps is "at the motor". When reading power figures on a dyno, the output is substantially lower, due to drivetrain loss (google it).

215ps = approx 160kw. You would expect this to be something like 120 RWKW, but its impossible to say without putting the car on a dyno.

Ach! 200 from a 350, not easy at all... NA's arent cheap to mod for power, the 190 achieved above is pretty good and unless you've got cash to burn i'd settle for that.

After what you've got its going to mean a bit of head work and cams to up air flow and also some ecu work to try and tweak the tune and up the rev limit.

After that its a case of hoping the internals will cope with the load, and if you need to sort out internals, then you may aswell up the displacement.

After all the above.. you may aswell have just thrown a turbo at it and run low boost and gained better results.

The comment made about nos is actually not a bad one. A small shot delivered not too close to the plenum wont stress the engine too much, is cheap and effective.

tbh tho, if you want high performance out of an NA on a budget, you bought the wrong car.

RWKW = Rear Wheel Kilowatts

The figure of 215ps is "at the motor". When reading power figures on a dyno, the output is substantially lower, due to drivetrain loss (google it).

215ps = approx 160kw. You would expect this to be something like 120 RWKW, but its impossible to say without putting the car on a dyno.

Thanks alot,cheers

Ach! 200 from a 350, not easy at all... NA's arent cheap to mod for power, the 190 achieved above is pretty good and unless you've got cash to burn i'd settle for that.

After what you've got its going to mean a bit of head work and cams to up air flow and also some ecu work to try and tweak the tune and up the rev limit.

After that its a case of hoping the internals will cope with the load, and if you need to sort out internals, then you may aswell up the displacement.

After all the above.. you may aswell have just thrown a turbo at it and run low boost and gained better results.

The comment made about nos is actually not a bad one. A small shot delivered not too close to the plenum wont stress the engine too much, is cheap and effective.

tbh tho, if you want high performance out of an NA on a budget, you bought the wrong car.

Not necessarily modding on a budget or anything im satisfied with the car as it is was just itnerested in what it would take and what could be gained its good to know that i can get to 190ish with some bolt ons...does seem that turbo is the way to go if i want more power in the future though =P

  • 3 months later...
Just got home from the Dyno and i got 191rwkw. Mods Popcharger with Z Tube, Plenum Spacer, light wieght Pulleys, Extractors and a Grounding kit.

I Dyno the car stock when i got it and had 163rwkw. So about 28kw of mods. 9 more to go :cool:

Do you mean light weight fly wheel or did u actually replace the Water Pump,Alternator Pulleys???? Do u have a link of what u did?

Cheers

Watch this space Iv got a workshop who deals in those quafie LSDs I posted about earlier getting back to me on a price next week hopefully. I will be hooking up a 50/70 shot of NOS once I have a diff that will actually get the power to the ground

Found some webpage on google late one night with some guys auto 4 door G35 pulling a 12.9 with nothing more than a catback + a 75 shot. He was using stock spark plugs as well

I remember a Guy NSW SAU got a quote from reputable Sydney workshop for HKS Super charger KIT, Drive in Drive Out job for something like 7K [i think was the figure]

apparently the 350Z twin turbo kit can overheat the 350GT for some reason and needs extensive modification to fit was the reason he went super charge

Last time I was @ QR there was a guy with a supercharged 350z with a 5 speed auto

I know his car had a supercharger/intercooler, the exhaust looked stock. He said it made 215 @ the wheels.... and it made around 140 stock.... Dosent sound right to me when my V35 with a catback makes 170 with the 5 speed auto.. oh im talking about rwkw

Last time I was @ QR there was a guy with a supercharged 350z with a 5 speed auto

I know his car had a supercharger/intercooler, the exhaust looked stock. He said it made 215 @ the wheels.... and it made around 140 stock.... Dosent sound right to me when my V35 with a catback makes 170 with the 5 speed auto.. oh im talking about rwkw

I just got my 6MT dyno'd at chip torque.

Only has grounding kit and fujitsubo exhaust (upto the y pipe, not cats).

Made 158 rwkw, the guy said that the air fuel mixture was good, torque was good and showed no reason for a low rwkw as i said 165-170 was the norm...

What is? Surely the manual has more than 5 speed right?

Well im going to get it dyno'd again after i put on:

Stainless Y-pipe

Stainless reinforced Headers with heat wrap

HFC with resonators

Motordyne Basic Plenum spacer

Z-tube

Pop charger

How much will i get with all that?

How hard is it to put on lightweight flywheel?

Dyno numbers depend on the dyno. Different machines with different operators will give different readings. For example my car used to pull 180rwkW on CRD and Unigroup's dynos here in Sydney, but only 170rwkW on APS' in Melbourne with the same mods/tune. They all used Dyno Dynamics in Shootout Mode.

All that should matter to you is the difference pre and post-mods, as a percentage, and what it will do in the real world. You should only be concerned that your car is making less power than everyone else's if you run back to back rolling acceleration tests and you're significantly slower.

You should be able to hit 200rwkW on "happy" dynos with all the bolt-ons, and a set of cams. I've got everything bolted on to my Z33 and, on CRD's dyno, I got around 195rwkW I think.

If I had a set of Step 1 cams in my engine so it would rev all the way to 7200RPM (it chokes out at 7000RPM right now, and levels out from around 6800RPM) 200rwkW on their dyno shouldn't be impossible with otherwise standard internals. Bear in mind that's on a 280ps engine - on a 300ps engine I would probably be hitting 200rwkW on their dyno by now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...