Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I recently bought myself a clean r33 turbo which is my first turbo car. I have been reading through the forum and searching like mad and have learnt some really great stuff! there really is a great amount of info on here.

The problem is I cant find an answer to this question, it is probably really simple and hasnt deserved a thread until now :)

I am trying to get my head around these boost controllers. i know the 33's run 5 psi low boost and then up to 8 passing 4500rpm.

I would like to increase mine to the 10ish mark (to look after the frail stock turbo!)

what i am wondering is:

- will this shorten the life of the turbo dramatically?

- can i retain the hi/low boost function with a boost controller? without a tune (to begin with) can this be done? will I have to use an electronic and not a bleed valve? any info here would be great!

also how tolerant are the 33s when it come to mods and engine mods? i will be getting the car re-tuned eventually but i would like to use the mods as i buy them and not have to wait until i have collected them all and do it all at once. will the ecu be able to adjust and handle the basic mods (cooler, sligth boost increase, turbo back exhaust) without any fueling problems? dont want to risk the motor thats all!

thanks in advnace

jason

covered to death

how hard did you look?

theres a factory free boost hack on the r33 GTST, look for it in the tutorial section

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/HO...ost-t42895.html

I have a manual dual stage boost controller that will give you adjustable HI and LOW boost at the flick of a switch, was running 8psi/12psi pretty well, Have electronic boost controller now so dont need it

yeah i did see that link. thanks though. i was keen to retain the factory hi/low setting and was wondering if a manual boost controller would remove that or if you put it up 3 psi for example if it would just become 8/11 instead of 5/8

was also keen to hear peoples opinions on turbo wear

thanks

define turbo wear ? you cant really put a number on it . yes it will have a shorter life based on the fact its working harder .

if you knew what you were doing you could use a manual boost controller to achive what you said in the above post but if you dont know how to do it i suggest you dont

I said I have a manual boost controller...... You could probably get it to retain factory Low boost at less then 4500rpm and HI boost above that if thats what you wanted by wiring the dual stage into the factory plug, getting the power and earth the right way around

Otherwise mine was hooked up to a switch in the car and it will Just be Low boost switch off, High boost switch on

If your interested PM me, I dont need my manual dual stage anymore.......

Its a dual stage turbosmart (Red)

You can plumb in some electronic boost controllers to retain stock 2 stage set up. I found this out more by mistake when I had my AVCR plumbed in. Stock first stage boost and second stage .85 bar.

I have been running high boost all the time for the last 3 or so years at .85 with stock inter cooler and no remap with no problems.

Some like it some dont

it appears i was lucky but on the whole the rb engine responds very well too stage on mods look below!!!

Edited by jjskyline79

you can make a manual boost controller do both depending on where you put it .

put it between the t peice and the ic pipe to achieve 7/10 psi (for example)

or remove the restrictor in the line to/from the solenoid and put the manual boost controller in the line between the solenoid and the hose from turbo intake to afm . to achieve 4/10psi (for example)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...