Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So i have just put a osg twin plate in my rb20 coupe and after bleeding it it seems like the slave cylinder piston needs to come out another 10mm to push on the fork because at the moment its not returning the pedal at all and when the pedal is at the floor, the slave cylinder piston in just in contact with the fork. If i jam a spacer eg screwdriver between the fork and the slave then i get some travel in the fork. The slave is brand new, and i used what i think is the correct throw out bearing. I have not made any adjustment to the master cylinder, however prior to changing the clutch it seemed to be working fine.

Any ideas would be much appreciated.

Cheers,

Antz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322892-os-twin-plate-install/
Share on other sites

If you used the standard Nissan throw out bearing it is the wrong one. It needs to be a smaller diameter bearing that should have been supplied in the kit. From memory this shouldnt really stop it from operating though....

are you sure it bled properly? because unless you have a decent pedal its quite possible there is still air in the system. You may also need to bleed the master cylinder. Quite often people do not use a clamp on the hose and they let the fluid in the master drain out. If you did let it empty try bleeding the master cylinder.

Have you adjusted the clutch at the pedal?

Did you buy the same diameter slave cylinder?

The bearing is the smaller diameter one, as supplied with the kit. I have bleed the slave well but not the master. have not adjusted the master at all. The fluid was all drained out. What adjustment needs to be done at the pedal? The slave is fine, its been in use for maybe 2 months before the clutch was changed.

Edited by antz31

if you get under the dash there is an adjustable pin in the pedal

sounds like you need to bleed the master. Given that it was fine before you put this clutch in try bleeding the master before making any other adjustments.

If that fails come back to this thread :D

Edited by ido09s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
×
×
  • Create New...