Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What is regarded as the best exhaust at the moment? I am looking for...

* Something made out of titanium (to save weight)

* Something that is legal (or close to it :P )

* Something that will not harm -- or hopefully -- will improve response.

Also, has anyone tried one of the Apexi hi-flow 3" cats?

LW.

meggala, good to hear you got such good results from the turbo and glad the thread was of help. Pretty responsive little package you have there - I wonder what the advocates of never using bush bearing turbos would say to your results?

two people that just dont get it then.... your gunna kill your cars...

so it would follow that my car shouldnt be running.

where do you get your info from? heresay, or actual experience? I can understand concern for someone who may damage their car, but dude, give it a rest - your not their mother.

I had no probs at all running on base map in summer. when it made it to the dyno it was rich everywhere.

but anyway, thats a bit off subject

thanks steve, hey lwells. the n1 or the duel n1s are the best review and results at the moment. so if your in for something to the specs below i would go the n1. :wassup:

What is regarded as the best exhaust at the moment? I am looking for...

* Something made out of titanium (to save weight)

* Something that is legal (or close to it :P )

* Something that will not harm -- or hopefully -- will improve response.

Also, has anyone tried one of the Apexi hi-flow 3" cats?

LW.

thanks steve, hey lwells.  the n1 or the duel n1s are the best review and results at the moment. so if your in for something to the specs below i would go the n1.  :wassup:

You mean the Apexi N1? What about the Ti HKS's?

Has anyone actual done a comparison of the various titanium exhausts lately?

Edit: I should have added, it has to be turbo-back for R32 GT-R

LW.

I have never taken my car down the 1/4, when I drive hard, I like it to last a bit longer than a few seconds. It is a daily driver. Not huge on cruises, prefer to go for drives with smaller groups. Cruises tend to attract too much attention and end up stuck behind guys who may not be too interested in a spirited drive.

BTW DJ, are you going to answer my questions?

What about these units?

http://www.fujitsubo.co.jp/search/prod-v.p...cnamID=00000520

Edit: Whoops, wrong link. Fixed now.

LW.

LW - That's the exect same exhaust I have - It seems to go well.

330 rwkw @21 PSI - HKS 3040 - similar setup to steve. Boost starts at 3000 RPM and I have it all at 4100 RPM.

LW - That's the exect same exhaust I have - It seems to go well.

 

330 rwkw @21 PSI - HKS 3040 - similar setup to steve. Boost starts at 3000 RPM and I have it all at 4100 RPM.

Can I ask where you got it and how much you payed? (PM me if you don't want to post)

Cheers,

LW.

LW,

Did you follow the links I posted back here, about the HKS Ti Drag system ?

It works a treat, but it's different from the other HKS Ti systems, many of them only have a Ti ail pipe.

Yup, was rather impressive. Just trying to way it up against other titanium systems.

LW.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...