Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

s15 eyelids $30

s15 washer bottle $20

s15 overflow bottle $20

s15 parcel shelf $20

s15 dual gauge pillar brand new $90

s15 genuine veilside rear bar painted blue $50

s14 sr20det long motor missing a few things suits rebuild $200

s13 180sx turbo back exhuast 3 inch $100

-4 fittings 180deg and 90deg $10ea or $40 for the lot i think theres roughly 8 fittings

-10 braided line 40cm and 30cm $20 the lot

brand new td05 oil drains x 2 $10 ea

2 x greddy td05h-18g cartridges require rebuild wheels are fine $25 for both

2 inch striaght silicone hose brand new will also throw in 4 assorted hoses as well $30

3 inch straight alloy pipe $15

s15 rear brake light $10

qld personlised plates 314 hfo (1 slimline 1 standard) $30

skyline radiator mounts with rubber $10

rb26 aftermarket o2 sensor adapters $10

rb26 pistons $60

rb26 sump baffles $30

rb26 brand new genuine nissan dump pipe gaskets $20

rb26 manifold-turbo gaskets $10

rb26 oil pressure sender $10

rb26 air con pump $50

5 inch canon $20

4 inch canon $20

4 inch canon with 2 bolt flange $50

car cover protects from snow hail rain and sun suits sports cars such as s15 s14 s13 r32 r33 r34 ect... $30

located on the gold coast

brad 0421511710

sms or pm for pics

Edited by toy515

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...