Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Recently replaced my clutch master cylinder with the assistance of this post here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/To...Ma-t126049.html

Fantastic tutorial helped out heaps. I have completely bled the system out and everything is connected back up. Used the following tutorial for that.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Bl...amp;mode=linear

So my issue is I can't tell if there is air in the system or if there is something wrong. Im only getting pressure in about half the pedal. i Cant see/hear/feel any air coming out of the system and I have bled it from the 3 valves that i can find.

The one on the master cylinder, the one on the dampner box and the one on the slave. I have an 89 GTST and from what I can tell in the tutorial there are 4 valves but I can onlu find 3? Wondering if this could be the source of my problem?

Any ideas would be awesome! Cheers :blush:

where is the fourth valve? I have found the one on the master cylinder, the one on the dampener box and the one on the slave... i have followed the line from the master to the dampener and cant find one in between but think this is where im missing one???

I followed the instructions exactly except for the fact that I couldnt find the second bleeder he was talkin about. The one from the master leading to the box. I found the one ON the master, ON the box and ON the slave but none in between. Is it possible that my master cylinder wasn't the problem? I was driving along, I clutched in and I heard a loud pop noise and gear changing was no longer possible. When I clutch in and out at the moment I can see the slave moving but it's not quite enough to fully engage the clutch as I still can't get it into gear.

A good indication if air is still in the line is the pedal sometimes won't return completely from the floor. There are 3 bleed points as you have already found. I use a one man bleeding system which comprises a small bottle and clear tube (can be purchased from SuperCheap, Repco etc). With some fluid in the bottle during the bleed process you can attach the clear tube to a bleed point and open it and pump the pedal as many times as required without the need to open and close the bleed during pedal movements as on the return stroke liquid from the bottle is sucked backwards rather than air being sucked back into the system. The clear tube allows you to see the air bubbles and once they stop you can close an move to the next point. I typically do all 3 points twice to ensure all air is removed.

If the air is out of the system and you still can't engage the clutch you may need to adjust the pedal takeup point. The clutch master cylinder rod is attached to the pedal via a fork. The fork is threaded and its position on the rod can be adjusted by simply screwing it inwards or outwards and thereby adjusting the pedal position when the clutch engages. I have only just had to repair my fork as it stripped the thread and moved inwards (moved closer to the master cylinder) making the clutch engage when the pedal was just off the floor. I subsequently drilled the threaded portion out and welded a nut the back of it and screwed it outwards so now it wont be affected by my very heavy clutch and the clutch now engages when the pedal is halfway off the floor.

Hope this helps.

Ok so for those interested, I have found the source of all my problems. There is a metal bracket that holds the clutch pedal rigid to the firewall. One of the spot welds has popped off meaning there is not enough pressure being put on the master cylinder to enghe te clutch. Effectively the pedal goes a but sideways when pressed in. So, I may have replaced the master cylinder for no reason haha!

ANYWAY, I'm trying to find someone who has a welder I can borrow. The spot that needs welding is tough to access though! Will see how we go.

Ok so for those interested, I have found the source of all my problems. There is a metal bracket that holds the clutch pedal rigid to the firewall. One of the spot welds has popped off meaning there is not enough pressure being put on the master cylinder to enghe te clutch. Effectively the pedal goes a but sideways when pressed in. So, I may have replaced the master cylinder for no reason haha!

ANYWAY, I'm trying to find someone who has a welder I can borrow. The spot that needs welding is tough to access though! Will see how we go.

I had the same issue. Ended up buying a stock second hand one and had it beefed up with extra welding - this way its stronger than a repaired one or a Nismo replacement.

Just remove it to have it welded, there is no space down there. I replaced my master and slave at the same time for peace of mind. Fitting the master was a nightmare and so was bleeding.

I have been looking around and there is a product that panel beaters use by 3M called automix panel bond. I'm thinking of giving this a crack before replacing it completely. It is still in position where it's sitting and from what I understand this stuff is very strong and equivalent to factory welding in most cases. my next problem is going to be getting some as i dont need a massive amount...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...