Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh Ghost Who Walks, we use Optimax, 1.5 bar boost, with ceramic coated piston crowns, combustion chambers, valve heads, exhaust ports and exhaust manifold. I actually exaggerated a little bit, best we have seen so far is 388 rwkw on Optimax, it made 442 with Elf LMS. But I am working on a new camshaft spec with a little more lift, which should pick up the 12 rwkw.

There are no real secrets in getting a 9 to 1 engine to make big horsepower over a useable rpm range. Keep the boost down by running the right size turbo with enough airflow to make the horsepower target, is the most important. The next is very smooth combustion chambers, with oil and water temperatures under control. Correct heat range spark plugs are essential. Back it up with sensible A/F ratios and tune the ignition timing very closely.

Hope that helps

Hi Sydneykid,

"Sensible A/F ratios"

OK - for optimax, i'm assuming that this is in the 11's...

"and tune the ignition timing very closely."

Close to detonation? or do you mean listen closely for detonation?

I also read recently that the onset of detonation is always accompanied with a puff of blac smoke from the exhaust - is this how you would detect detonation?

Cheers for your help,

Matt

Look at that wiseco catalog...

The CR all looks so low.

I reckon they found a whole bunch of 86-88 millimeter bore pistons from whatever cars they have in the US and modified the wrist pin connect so they fit Skylines.

ie. they aren't really Skyline pistons but some blanks that have been milled to fit the RB.

T.

Hi Matt, firstly let me say that what I am using as an example here is a $25K engine. So I use every method I can to protect it.

As for A/F ratios, RB engines seem to make max power around 12.5 to 1, some drop off dramatically in power when you get much richer than that. Others aren't quite so sensitive, I have no idea why this is the case. So if it doesn't affect the power output too much, I target around 12 to 1, and we may have to go down to 11.5 but this is unusual. Basically we just give the engine what it wants, as each one is unique.

Moving onto detecting detonation, the car has an EGT sensor which is a god indicator, as is the fast and wide lambda sensor, the Power FC detonation detection, with the standard RB26 knock sensors, is also a huge help. But by far the best is the human ear, so I have a set of headphones with a mike and a small battery powered amplifier. It is based on the Autospeed design, you can see it here;

http://www.autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=1353

You can buy similar commercial/workshop equipment, I think SnapOn have one.

So when doing the ignition timing maps, we tune it on the dyno with a very close eye and an ear on the knock detectors (all of them). I also have a Datalogit system with which I review the PFC data from each run (and when we drive it in anger).

Hope that helps some more

PS, this sounds like I am a dyno tuning guru, truth is, our race team dyno guy is way better than me at this stuff. I help out where I can, as this type of thing really needs two sets of eyes and ears.

Hi T0nyGTSt, I don't know for sure, but maybe Wiseco originally make them for RB30's which have 15% smaller combustion chambers. Perhaps that's why the comp ratio is so low when you use them with a DOHC 4 valve head. They also sell lots of stuff for VG30's in the US and they have combusion chamber volumes around the RB30 size. Who knows.

Do you think it is fair to compare a ceramic coated everything 25K engine that gets tuned before every race meet and has all the ecu data logged and reviewed regularly with the average guy on the street wanting an engine that can be driven in anger without problems and only gets dynoed once in a blue moon?

I dont.

Cheers Sydneykid,

Just got one more question, what happens to the EGT's as detonation begins? i'd guess that they decrease due to the 'boundary layer' being destroyed thus causing more heat transfer to the metal in the combustion chamber?

Thanks again,

Matt

PS - you know you're a guru :P

I agree with 8.5, but really I dont think you loose that much by dropping CR to 8.5 from 9. A car may be better to drive with 9, but mine with 8.5 is absolutely fine on the road, dives very well - and detonation is very low even on 40deg day running 1.7 bar on bp ultimate - peace of mind.

If 8.5 is that bad, why did nissan use it for the GTR?

BTW Paul, how many ring lands did you smash?:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...