Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As for those twin scroll turbine housings from ATP , have a look inside them if possible because some people reckon they're a bit dodgy looking . I've no idea who makes them and no ones said they have Garrett markings on them so anyone's guess .

A .

just received myne yesterday. has ATP cast onto the housing so i assume its made by them. some of the machining leaves a little to be desired and the outlet area looks like a choke point but hopefully it'll work a lot better than the IW housing i have at the moment.

some shitty phone pics. thats a 3" v band flange sitting on both sides to give you an idea of the small diameter inside, very different to the garrett housings which are a smooth and progressive opening from the turbine size to the flange size as in the first pic.

10012009049.jpg

Image0031.jpg

Image0030.jpg

Image0028.jpg

Image0027.jpg

Image0026.jpg

Image0025.jpg

Image0025.jpg

Image0032.jpg

Edited by JonnoHR31

found one. anything in particular you want to see? took shitloads of photos anyway. one more thing i noticed is theres no machined area around the bolt holes for a nut to seat, might have to get into it with the grinder.

http://s224.photobucket.com/albums/dd251/JonnoHR31/turbo/

Is that a twin scroll internally gated turbine housing?

In regards to other questions asked here, the 1.06a/r T4 twin scroll GT3076Rs spool AWESOME in all the cases I have seen - quicker than the .82a/r T3 housing when used with a proper T4 TS manifold. It'd go very very nicely!

Hell, a GT3582R with a 1.06a/r T4 Twin scroll housing spools similar to a .82a/r T3 GT3076 :D

When your fit the CHRA you might want to check how far the CHRA bolts protrude into the volute. Try and grind them back so they are flush with the inner wall if you can.

This is a tip that Full-Race mentions on their web page with regard to the .78 twin scroll housing....it might apply to the 1.06 housing as well.

Edited by juggernaut1
  • 4 months later...

n regards to other questions asked here, the 1.06a/r T4 twin scroll GT3076Rs spool AWESOME in all the cases I have seen - quicker than the .82a/r T3 housing when used with a proper T4 TS manifold. It'd go very very nicely!

That's good to hear...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
×
×
  • Create New...