Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heya guys got a few random parts here all prices negotiable. i will put pics up soon, let me know if your interested cheers

R34 rb25det neo motor long suit rebuild. 60 000kms. leaned out and seized one piston ring on no 1 cylinder. pulled the motor apart straight away before any major damage happened. Block is slightly scored on no1, showed machinist, said a hone may work if not 0.5mm bore out. Head and everything else is perfect, oil changes regular and very clean. currently dismantled $1000

Bee-r revlimiter hardly used, in my car for fun and launch control. All works perfect, comes with crazy illustrated jap instructions and all ecu print outs. $300

Standard injectors (blue) out of r34 rb25det neo motor working fine, the motor had done 60 00kms. injectors also come with elec plugs attached and some wire hanging out to solder onto if you want to custom:)

injectors $200 or $400 for intake, rail and injectors

Aluminum twin wing black 1400mm long by 250mm wide $150

4 rims similar looking to r33 rims and tyres, pcw 5 spoke 16x7 5x114. 2 tyres 50% and 2 60% $150

4 stock r33 rims and tyres 60% tread left on 2 and other on the wear line $250

Come with 6 spare 16 inch tyres

R32 random parts

Roll cage just the front section. suit a 2 door 32 without a sunroof $250

Cusco front camber arms. fixed 4 degrees of camber, rubbers perfect condition $150

Rear camber arms standard $50

Stock black boot lid with standard spoiler. clear coat is starting to fade. $50

Air con. from fire wall forward all lines, compressor (off a neo motor) and brackets, condenser. working perfect before removal for de-weighting $200

Set of lowered Eibach spring and kyb shocks no oil leaks. Done less than 4000kms and shocks look like they have some sorta adjustment at the top $300

Koyo aluminum radiator one core is leaking $100

pm or 0434 313 923

can post pics of other parts

cheers

Dan

pics location?

"R32 random parts

Roll cage just the front section. suit a 2 door 32 without a sunroof $250"

Im in Perth mate. Im having probs uploading pics i can email or sms

let me know if your interested, can prob sort out post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...