Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If there was 2.75" i'd definately get that.

2.5" has very linear power from low to high. Gives more precise throttle adjustment/levels too. Revs faster or more responsive. Lacks the kick in power and i'm guessing max power compared to 3" by feel.

3" is pretty empty down low but is a blast at high rpm (5k and over) like VTEC just kicked in yo. Lack of back pressure makes the throttle feel weak at low RPM and not very precise. Feels like it has more top end power than 2.5".

This is from a guy who just got his cat back changed today.

This is a race car though, and the way to do a race car exhaust is just dump the exhaust primary's into the biggest bastard exhaust system you can fit under the car, who cares if the car feels a bit weak driving around the pit garages, the actual exhaust pipe has very little to do with how the car makes power, thats all in the primaries ala extractors.

I think you should go RB30 with a stroker crank. Spool have a 3.4L option (or you could go custom) along with max oversize pistons. It will limit your revs to about 8000rpm but is a better option, and would sound tough. If people can and have hit 170's and 180's with relatively mild builds (mild in comparison to what is possible and how spastic you can go with cams, revs and even compression) 200kw with a 3.4 (or possibly 3.5 combined with max oversize??) should be similarly achievable providing you can get it to flow the air.

Edited by SKiT_R31
This is a race car though, and the way to do a race car exhaust is just dump the exhaust primary's into the biggest bastard exhaust system you can fit under the car, who cares if the car feels a bit weak driving around the pit garages, the actual exhaust pipe has very little to do with how the car makes power, thats all in the primaries ala extractors.

Yes, but as the exhaust diameter told me, depending on how much power you make or mods, a bigger exhaust diameter will push the powerband higher but thinner so a compromise is a must. Also with the lack of back pressure, the throttle feel was on or off which I don't think is good for racing.

EDIT: There was a VERY noticeable difference in power with 75% throttle and 100%.

Edited by TyresBro
I think you should go RB30 with a stroker crank. Spool have a 3.4L option (or you could go custom) along with max oversize pistons. It will limit your revs to about 8000rpm but is a better option, and would sound tough. If people can and have hit 170's and 180's with relatively mild builds (mild in comparison to what is possible and how spastic you can go with cams, revs and even compression) 200kw with a 3.4 (or possibly 3.5 combined with max oversize??) should be similarly achievable providing you can get it to flow the air.

This does sound good but I want to keep in the under 3L class.

Does anyone have any idea on the price of getting a serious NA head built, excluding head as I already have that.

I hevent read th thread.

But in my opinion, the benefits you will gain from using a 26 head a not worth spending the extra money as opposed to a 25 head.

26 head = ~ 2K

25 head = ~$500

Take the difference in $1500 and spend it on the engine.

As far as I am concerned. Power figures when it comes to NA engines are dependent on 2 things:

1) intake runner length

2) compression ratio

my advise. If you want good power figure (throwing out drivablility):

Reduce weight: lighten the bottom end, balance it, lighten the box (including clutch and flywheel) driveshafts/s and diff (spool diff would be nice) this will let the engine rev harder and faster.

Tune runner length: the shorter the the intake runner length (yes, ITB's ARE worth it!!!!) the narrower the power band will be, the higher in the rev range it will be, but the more power it will produce. this is ESSENTIAL to get right with the next step

Cam profile: You want a nice healthy valve overlap to get as much fresh air into the engine as possble. Cam lift and duration will be dependent on alot of factors including the runner length, volume of the engine and ecu tune.

Exhause manifold: No. Coby extractors will not do the job properly. Get it built from scratch, get it tuned right (spend the 1.5K difference here and the ecu, and ITB's, the benifits will far outweigh a 26 head!!!!)

the right Juice: tune with and run E85 (you will have to use e85 friendly fuel system - or drain it after every drive) 109 octane etc. for best results

200NA kw is easily acheivable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey keep the ideas coming, I'm always keen on projects! But, problem fixed!  I got a cheapie ozito scope from Bunnings and had a good look in and around the bearing and sensor hole. I couldn't see a smoking gun but the bearing looked a bit strange, especially when comparing with a new one. I thought the cover had come off the bearing magnets.  Sorry for pics of a screen, I didn't have an SD card.     Good thing I had the old one to inspect. So, given I'm like a pit crew with wheel bearings and luckily I had a spare bearing because I f**ked up my parts order, I decided to just smash it out. Got the old one out in about an hour. So much easier when the parts haven't had a chance to rust together yet. 😂 And, well, found the problem.    In the second pic at about the 8 o'clock position, you'll see what I think is the tip of the old sensor.  The new sensor has definitely been rubbing but it's all intact, just a little shiny so I'm hoping it's fine.  The car brakes perfectly now and no errors.  I think the job took about 2.5h in the end. 👍🏻 I really appreciate the help in here as usual. Thanks guys.
    • I was only looking because I saw some drops on the ground but it wasn't alot. Recently had it serviced will ask the mech to confirm. Find it strange that it looks standard though, can see in another photo of a random box 
    • So...not sure if you know if that has always been there or why you went looking. It could be old damage from a clutch explosion, or even just the gearbox got dropped somewhere along the line. Basically, you should seal it up to stop oil and dust getting into the bellhousing, but it doesn't matter too much and is not structural. I'd suggest something like a glob of JB Weld. BTW what gearbox oil are you running, I would guess the breather has been spewing it everywhere.
    • Hey Duncan thanks for your reply. Sorry mate I know the photos are shit.  Took another photo for reference. Seems the casing does have a hole in it looking on the net, fluid seeping out. Added a photo   
    • Very hard to make out what you mean, is it the squarish hole with redline shockproof (probably) under it? Is that pic from on top of the engine with the firewall to the left of pic and engine to the right? Either way, spray the area liberally with degreaser and try again, maybe circle the part you are worried about
×
×
  • Create New...