Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All these parts are of a 1998 R33

2 HICAS units $30 each

Stock r33 standard springs ( good to clear you defects ) $100

Series II silver spoiler mint condition $80

r33 standard castor rods $80

r33 non abs diff $50

2hp air compressor $20

r33 passenger side plastic wheel arch brand new from NISSAN $40

img0905f.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0906ix.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0907w.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0908bl.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0909t.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0910f.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

pickup or send AUS wide i dont care. cheers

Geraus

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/336942-r33-series-2-1998-melb/
Share on other sites

also have a Brand new blitz panel air filter suitable for r33,32,34, etc. its brand new never used in a box only opened to take photos, for 85.99 thats how much i brought it for! but il get rid of it for 70!

here are some photos!

img0912m.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0913q.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0914m.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0915gm.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

original m-spec lip

i got another front series 2 front bar with foggys

img0916n.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

some japbrand cannon straight through with no mufflerrs from japan catback sounds sick doesnt drone.

img0917hk.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

catco highflow cat 3inch brand new only used for dyno run got it from Justjap for 175 give me an offer.

img0918y.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0919y.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

sony xplod sub $50

img0920t.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

img0921w.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

dsc00260eja.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

pair of work japanese stitches rims, 17x9 offset 35

no tyres 400

with tyres 500

Edited by geraus

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...