Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah lazy coils will cause misfires, not a straight power loss...

Plugs look fine, so long as the conductors are still in tact, and the plug isn't wet or covered in unburnt fuel.

Checked the BOVs yet? Start there.

BTW A small leak in a vac line won't flow anywhere near enough air for you to even feel a power loss.

ISMR's dyno is generally considered a low reading dyno and if you say your gtr is all standard, then a figure of 160kw atw isn't that bad.

From memory with my chats to Indy, standard gtrs will do around ~170kw atw on his dyno. What did Indy have to say about it ? Standard evos/stis only do around ~140kw atw there.

And how about reversing the mods ? Install the factory exhaust and remove the boost gauge and replace the tapped line with a new one, reset ecu and then test again.

ISMR's dyno is generally considered a low reading dyno and if you say your gtr is all standard, then a figure of 160kw atw isn't that bad.

From memory with my chats to Indy, standard gtrs will do around ~170kw atw on his dyno. What did Indy have to say about it ? Standard evos/stis only do around ~140kw atw there.

And how about reversing the mods ? Install the factory exhaust and remove the boost gauge and replace the tapped line with a new one, reset ecu and then test again.

indy said there is definately a problem, other cars of the same are making 10/20kw more

indy said there is definately a problem, other cars of the same are making 10/20kw more

Hrmm fair enough.. if it was myself, i wouldn't be worrying too much about a 10kw discrepency but if you say it feels much slower.

If it was me, i'd quickly chuck that factory exhaust on and remove the boost gauge, reset and test. Could be your ecu doing dicky things like the above mentioned. Checked intake/filter condition and cleared it out with upper engine cleaner? What's the air intake temp sensor reading when doing the dyno runs as that can affect ignition timing/power.

Edited by Touge Kyousou

My gtr with kakimoto exhaust, trust front pipes and apex pods made 160kw @9psi with the boost restrictor removed. Wouldn't boost any higher than that probably due to not having an ebc. This was at boostworx in adelaide which runs a mainline dyno I think.

well i was boosting up to 13 psi, sol it should be more than 160.. :D

Yeah should be near on 200kw at that power. Maybe try another workshop for a second opinion? As people of said it could be a number of things, take it to a tuner that specializes in GT-Rs if you haven't already.

i took it to Indy at is motoring, i have only heard good things about him, he does GTR'S all the time and he said that my power is definately down..

i will tick things off as i go

i am looking for a standard computer ATM

was it done in RWD?

have you done a compression test?

what position is the CAS at?

have you checked base ignition timing?

The Dyno was in 4wd

I have checked all those things

I guess I will take to a third mechanic and see if he can figure it out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...