Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Going to get some braided lines made up as a few of mine are corroded and leaking..

Having removed the turbos last night i have a question in regards to the lengths. The water (return i think?) from the split on the block for the rear turbo does a loop before the banjo joint on the turbo and the oil supply for the front turbo does the same.

I assume this is so the pipes are equal lengths due to the different locations the splits are on the block. So on to my question..

Should i get the braided lines made up to the exact same lengths as the standard piping (including the loops) or can i get them made up shorter - not sure if this will effect supply/return to the turbos and possibly cause premature wear?

Anyone who could shed some light would be helpful :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/338825-rb26-braided-turbo-lines/
Share on other sites

Going to get some braided lines made up as a few of mine are corroded and leaking..

Having removed the turbos last night i have a question in regards to the lengths. The water (return i think?) from the split on the block for the rear turbo does a loop before the banjo joint on the turbo and the oil supply for the front turbo does the same.

I assume this is so the pipes are equal lengths due to the different locations the splits are on the block. So on to my question..

Should i get the braided lines made up to the exact same lengths as the standard piping (including the loops) or can i get them made up shorter - not sure if this will effect supply/return to the turbos and possibly cause premature wear?

Anyone who could shed some light would be helpful :)

Hey,

I think those loops are to allow movement as the manifolds expand/contract (the pipes are quite stiff).

I replaced mine with braided lines (no looping) when I went to a big single; no problems thus far.

Cheers,

Saliya

I'd urge you to use stock replacment steel lines, not braided. Especially if it's a street car. The braided hose will perish relativly quickly witht he constant heat cycling.

But hey, braided hoses look pretty I guess...

J.

well...... oil cooler lines dont run near the exhaust manifold, turbo lines do

just use that orange stuff with the fibreglass inside it, works wonders for high temp sheilding

they come in different sizes to suit braided turbo lines, breather hosing, wiring looms etc

ive used that stuff on breather hoses that are actually touching exhaust piping, its been about a year and its no where close to burning through

pic:

13_eng.jpg

edit: sorry i just realised your still running your twin setup and i also urge you to run the standard metal lines for more reasons than 1

just make sure you use fresh copper washers, the lines have no kinks or have ever been bent

what i wrote above applys to topmounts but i guess you could put some sheilding on the steel lines too? haha

Edited by snozzle
Oil cooler kits all use braided lines, never thought a braided hose would perish any quicker?

I am more wanting to do this for ease of installation - obviously looks aren't important as you can't see down there once the piping is on!

As was said above, oil cooler lines are not exposed to the same heat/thermal cycling as lines in/on/around exhaust manifolds, dump pipes, exhaust housings etc.

How often do are you planning to remove/install the turbo's???

Measuring and making the hoses will take you hours to do properly... Not to mention the cost.

Also, that orange sheithing is designed as a flame barrier... it's designed to stop a direct flame from penitrating it for a pre-determined amount of time. It dose work to insulate against some heat though.

Cheers

Justin

just use that orange stuff with the fibreglass inside it, works wonders for high temp sheilding

they come in different sizes to suit braided turbo lines, breather hosing, wiring looms etc

ive used that stuff on breather hoses that are actually touching exhaust piping, its been about a year and its no where close to burning through

I used the orange stuff to shield a teflon braided oil feed that ran very close to the exhaust manifold (<5mm clearance) and on the turbo drain covering blue rubber hose. After less than 1000k's I've pulled it all apart and the shielding on the drain looks fine however the hose underneath is charred while the orange stuff has dried out and crumbled on the oil feed with the teflon line also blackened. Don't assume this stuff does anything! Hardline and a good air gap are the way to go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...